Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Source
| Written Communication | 2 |
Author
| Chukharev-Hudilainen, Evgeny | 1 |
| Conijn, Rianne | 1 |
| Samuelson, Dianne | 1 |
| Speltz, Emily Dux | 1 |
| Thomson, Jennifer M. | 1 |
| Van Der Steen, Steffie | 1 |
| Waes, Luuk Van | 1 |
| Zaanen, Menno van | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Digit Span Test | 1 |
| Wechsler Adult Intelligence… | 1 |
| Woodcock Johnson Tests of… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkConijn, Rianne; Speltz, Emily Dux; Zaanen, Menno van; Waes, Luuk Van; Chukharev-Hudilainen, Evgeny – Written Communication, 2022
The study of revision has been a topic of interest in writing research over the past decades. Numerous studies have, for instance, shown that learning-to-revise is one of the key competences in writing development. Moreover, several models of revision have been developed, and a variety of taxonomies have been used to measure revision in empirical…
Descriptors: Writing (Composition), Revision (Written Composition), Writing Evaluation, Evaluation Methods
Van Der Steen, Steffie; Samuelson, Dianne; Thomson, Jennifer M. – Written Communication, 2017
This study addresses the current debate about the beneficial effects of text processing software on students with different working memory (WM) during the process of academic writing, especially with regard to the ability to display higher-level conceptual thinking. A total of 54 graduate students (15 male, 39 female) wrote one essay by hand and…
Descriptors: Word Processing, Keyboarding (Data Entry), Writing (Composition), Educational Benefits
