Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| College Students | 1 |
| Documentation | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Eye Movements | 1 |
| Keyboarding (Data Entry) | 1 |
| Models | 1 |
| Revision (Written Composition) | 1 |
| Time Factors (Learning) | 1 |
| Writing (Composition) | 1 |
| Writing Evaluation | 1 |
Source
| Written Communication | 1 |
Author
| Chukharev-Hudilainen, Evgeny | 1 |
| Conijn, Rianne | 1 |
| Speltz, Emily Dux | 1 |
| Waes, Luuk Van | 1 |
| Zaanen, Menno van | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkConijn, Rianne; Speltz, Emily Dux; Zaanen, Menno van; Waes, Luuk Van; Chukharev-Hudilainen, Evgeny – Written Communication, 2022
The study of revision has been a topic of interest in writing research over the past decades. Numerous studies have, for instance, shown that learning-to-revise is one of the key competences in writing development. Moreover, several models of revision have been developed, and a variety of taxonomies have been used to measure revision in empirical…
Descriptors: Writing (Composition), Revision (Written Composition), Writing Evaluation, Evaluation Methods
