Descriptor
| Computer Software | 3 |
| Editing | 3 |
| Higher Education | 3 |
| Technical Writing | 3 |
| Editors | 1 |
| Inspection | 1 |
| Needs Assessment | 1 |
| Peer Evaluation | 1 |
| Quality Control | 1 |
| Technological Advancement | 1 |
| Word Processing | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Technical Communication:… | 3 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedCorbin, Michelle; Moell, Pat; Boyd Mike – Technical Communication: Journal of the Society for Technical Communication, 2002
Reviews typical software testing activities and then compares those activities to technical editing activities. Shows that by providing quality assurance through content editing, technical editors add value to the information development process and help give users the quality content they deserve. Concludes that product information must go…
Descriptors: Computer Software, Editing, Higher Education, Technical Writing
Peer reviewedZuchero, John – Technical Communication: Journal of the Society for Technical Communication, 1995
Describes how, by adapting software inspections to assess documentation and code, technical writers can collaborate with development personnel, editors, and customers to dramatically improve both the quality of documentation and the very process of inspecting that documentation. Notes that the five steps involved in the inspection process are:…
Descriptors: Computer Software, Editing, Higher Education, Inspection
Peer reviewedDuffy, Thomas M. – Technical Communication: Journal of the Society for Technical Communication, 1995
Surveys 28 expert technical editors regarding their views on editing and how computer-based tools could aid their work. Finds that the editing environment, the process of editing, the skills involved, and the errors found all influenced the types of tools need. Names tools the editors used and suggests others that should be developed. (SR)
Descriptors: Computer Software, Editing, Editors, Higher Education


