Descriptor
Source
| Structural Equation Modeling | 23 |
Author
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 23 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 14 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 5 |
| Reports - Research | 4 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 2 |
| Book/Product Reviews | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedSivo, Stephen A.; Willson, Victor L. – Structural Equation Modeling, 2000
Studied whether moving average or autoregressive moving average models fit two longitudinal data sets previously thought to possess quasi-simplex structures better than the quasi-simplex, one-factor, or autoregressive models. Results of a Monte Carlo study show the importance of evaluating the fit, propriety, and parsimony of models before one…
Descriptors: Causal Models, Error of Measurement, Goodness of Fit, Longitudinal Studies
Peer reviewedChin, Wynne W. – Structural Equation Modeling, 1996
The SEPATH structural equation modeling (SEM) software is a new module in the latest release of STATISTICA (version 5.0) for Windows 3.1 and Windows 95. SEPATH is a program that provides a comprehensive set of functions for the SEM modeling. The interface and the Monte Carlo capability are strong features. (SLD)
Descriptors: Computer Interfaces, Computer Software, Data Analysis, Estimation (Mathematics)
Peer reviewedFan, Xitao; Wang, Lin; Thompson, Bruce – Structural Equation Modeling, 1999
A Monte Carlo simulation study investigated the effects on 10 structural equation modeling fit indexes of sample size, estimation method, and model specification. Some fit indexes did not appear to be comparable, and it was apparent that estimation method strongly influenced almost all fit indexes examined, especially for misspecified models. (SLD)
Descriptors: Estimation (Mathematics), Goodness of Fit, Monte Carlo Methods, Sample Size
Peer reviewedJackson, Dennis L. – Structural Equation Modeling, 2001
Investigated the assumption that determining an adequate sample size in structural equation modeling can be aided by considering the number of parameters to be estimated. Findings from maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis support previous research on the effect of sample size, measured variable reliability, and the number of measured…
Descriptors: Estimation (Mathematics), Maximum Likelihood Statistics, Monte Carlo Methods, Reliability
Peer reviewedFouladi, Rachel T. – Structural Equation Modeling, 2000
Provides an overview of standard and modified normal theory and asymptotically distribution-free covariance and correlation structure analysis techniques and details Monte Carlo simulation results on Type I and Type II error control. Demonstrates through the simulation that robustness and nonrobustness of structure analysis techniques vary as a…
Descriptors: Analysis of Covariance, Correlation, Monte Carlo Methods, Multivariate Analysis
Dudgeon, Paul – Structural Equation Modeling, 2004
This article considers the implications for other noncentrality parameter-based statistics from Steiger's (1998) multiple sample adjustment to the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) measure. When a structural equation model is fitted simultaneously in more than 1 sample, it is shown that the calculation of the noncentrality parameter…
Descriptors: Statistical Analysis, Monte Carlo Methods, Structural Equation Models, Error of Measurement
Peer reviewedBandalos, Deborah L. – Structural Equation Modeling, 1997
Monte Carlo methods were used to study the accuracy and utility of estimators of overall error and error due to approximation in structural equation modeling. Effects of sample size, indicator reliabilities, and degree of misspecification were examined. The rescaled noncentrality parameter also was examined. Choosing among competing models is…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Error of Measurement, Estimation (Mathematics), Monte Carlo Methods
Peer reviewedFinch, John F.; And Others – Structural Equation Modeling, 1997
A Monte Carlo approach was used to examine bias in the estimation of indirect effects and their associated standard errors. Results illustrate the adverse effects of nonnormality on the accuracy of significance tests in latent variable models estimated using normal theory maximum likelihood statistics. (SLD)
Descriptors: Error of Measurement, Estimation (Mathematics), Maximum Likelihood Statistics, Monte Carlo Methods
« Previous Page | Next Page
Pages: 1 | 2
Direct link
