Descriptor
| Error of Measurement | 2 |
| Longitudinal Studies | 2 |
| Causal Models | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Goodness of Fit | 1 |
| Measures (Individuals) | 1 |
| Models | 1 |
| Monte Carlo Methods | 1 |
Source
| Structural Equation Modeling | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkWang, Jichuan – Structural Equation Modeling, 2004
In addition to assessing the rate of change in outcome measures, it may be useful to test the significance of outcome changes during specific time periods within an entire observation period under study. While discussing the delta method and bootstrapping, this study demonstrates how to use these 2 methods to estimate the standard errors of the…
Descriptors: Longitudinal Studies, Error of Measurement, Measures (Individuals), Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewedSivo, Stephen A.; Willson, Victor L. – Structural Equation Modeling, 2000
Studied whether moving average or autoregressive moving average models fit two longitudinal data sets previously thought to possess quasi-simplex structures better than the quasi-simplex, one-factor, or autoregressive models. Results of a Monte Carlo study show the importance of evaluating the fit, propriety, and parsimony of models before one…
Descriptors: Causal Models, Error of Measurement, Goodness of Fit, Longitudinal Studies
