Descriptor
Source
| Structural Equation Modeling | 13 |
Author
| Wang, Lin | 2 |
| Anderson, Ronald D. | 1 |
| Bandalos, Deborah L. | 1 |
| Fan, Xitao | 1 |
| Finch, John F. | 1 |
| Foss, Tron | 1 |
| Hancock, Gregory R. | 1 |
| Howell, Roy D. | 1 |
| Hox, Joop J. | 1 |
| Hutchinson, Susan R. | 1 |
| Jackson, Dennis L. | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 13 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 10 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedStapleton, Laura M. – Structural Equation Modeling, 2002
Studied the use of different weighting techniques in structural equation modeling and found, through simulation, that the use of an effective sample size weight provides unbiased estimates of key parameters and their sampling variances. Also discusses use of a popular normalization technique of scaling weights. (SLD)
Descriptors: Estimation (Mathematics), Sample Size, Scaling, Simulation
Peer reviewedRaykov, Tenko – Structural Equation Modeling, 2000
Shows that the conventional noncentrality parameter estimator of covariance structure models, currently implemented in popular structural modeling programs, possesses asymptotically potentially large bias, variance, and mean squared error (MSE). Presents a formal expression for its large-sample bias and quantifies large-sample bias and MSE. (SLD)
Descriptors: Error of Measurement, Estimation (Mathematics), Sample Size, Statistical Bias
Peer reviewedNevitt, Jonathan; Hancock, Gregory R. – Structural Equation Modeling, 2001
Evaluated the bootstrap method under varying conditions of nonnormality, sample size, model specification, and number of bootstrap samples drawn from the resampling space. Results for the bootstrap suggest the resampling-based method may be conservative in its control over model rejections, thus having an impact on the statistical power associated…
Descriptors: Estimation (Mathematics), Power (Statistics), Sample Size, Structural Equation Models
Peer reviewedHox, Joop J.; Maas, Cora J. M. – Structural Equation Modeling, 2001
Assessed the robustness of an estimation method for multilevel and path analysis with hierarchical data proposed by B. Muthen (1989) with unequal groups and small sample sizes and in the presence of a low or high intraclass correlation. Simulation results show the effects of varying these conditions on the within-group and between-groups part of…
Descriptors: Estimation (Mathematics), Robustness (Statistics), Sample Size, Simulation
Peer reviewedMarsh, Herbert W. – Structural Equation Modeling, 1998
Sample covariance matrices constructed with pairwise deletion for randomly missing data were used in a simulation with three sample sizes and five levels of missing data (up to 50%). Parameter estimates were unbiased, parameter variability was largely explicable, and no sample covariance matrices were nonpositive definite except for 50% missing…
Descriptors: Estimation (Mathematics), Goodness of Fit, Sample Size, Simulation
Peer reviewedOlmos, Antonio; Hutchinson, Susan R. – Structural Equation Modeling, 1998
The behavior of eight measures of fit used to evaluate confirmatory factor analysis models was studied through Monte Carlo simulation to determine the extent to which sample size, model size, estimation procedure, and level of nonnormality affect fit when analyzing polytomous data. Implications of results for evaluating fit are discussed. (SLD)
Descriptors: Estimation (Mathematics), Goodness of Fit, Monte Carlo Methods, Sample Size
Peer reviewedFan, Xitao; Wang, Lin; Thompson, Bruce – Structural Equation Modeling, 1999
A Monte Carlo simulation study investigated the effects on 10 structural equation modeling fit indexes of sample size, estimation method, and model specification. Some fit indexes did not appear to be comparable, and it was apparent that estimation method strongly influenced almost all fit indexes examined, especially for misspecified models. (SLD)
Descriptors: Estimation (Mathematics), Goodness of Fit, Monte Carlo Methods, Sample Size
Peer reviewedJackson, Dennis L. – Structural Equation Modeling, 2001
Investigated the assumption that determining an adequate sample size in structural equation modeling can be aided by considering the number of parameters to be estimated. Findings from maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis support previous research on the effect of sample size, measured variable reliability, and the number of measured…
Descriptors: Estimation (Mathematics), Maximum Likelihood Statistics, Monte Carlo Methods, Reliability
Peer reviewedOlsson, Ulf Henning; Foss, Tron; Troye, Sigurd V.; Howell, Roy D. – Structural Equation Modeling, 2000
Used simulation to demonstrate how the choice of estimation method affects indexes of fit and parameter bias for different sample sizes when nested models vary in terms of specification error and the data demonstrate different levels of kurtosis. Discusses results for maximum likelihood (ML), generalized least squares (GLS), and weighted least…
Descriptors: Estimation (Mathematics), Goodness of Fit, Least Squares Statistics, Maximum Likelihood Statistics
Peer reviewedWang, Lin; And Others – Structural Equation Modeling, 1996
Actual kurtotic and skewed data and varied sample sizes and estimation methods demonstrated that normal theory maximum likelihood and generalized least square estimators were fairly consistent and almost identical. Standard errors tended to underestimate the estimator's true variation but the problem was not serious for large samples. (SLD)
Descriptors: Error of Measurement, Estimation (Mathematics), Goodness of Fit, Least Squares Statistics
Peer reviewedBandalos, Deborah L. – Structural Equation Modeling, 1997
Monte Carlo methods were used to study the accuracy and utility of estimators of overall error and error due to approximation in structural equation modeling. Effects of sample size, indicator reliabilities, and degree of misspecification were examined. The rescaled noncentrality parameter also was examined. Choosing among competing models is…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Error of Measurement, Estimation (Mathematics), Monte Carlo Methods
Peer reviewedFinch, John F.; And Others – Structural Equation Modeling, 1997
A Monte Carlo approach was used to examine bias in the estimation of indirect effects and their associated standard errors. Results illustrate the adverse effects of nonnormality on the accuracy of significance tests in latent variable models estimated using normal theory maximum likelihood statistics. (SLD)
Descriptors: Error of Measurement, Estimation (Mathematics), Maximum Likelihood Statistics, Monte Carlo Methods
Peer reviewedAnderson, Ronald D. – Structural Equation Modeling, 1996
Goodness of fit indexes developed by R. P. McDonald (1989) and Satorra-Bentler scale correction methods (A. Satorra and P. M. Bentler, 1988) were studied. The Satorra-Bentler index is shown to have the least error under each distributional misspecification level when the model has correct structural specification. (SLD)
Descriptors: Error of Measurement, Estimation (Mathematics), Goodness of Fit, Maximum Likelihood Statistics


