NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Source
Structural Equation Modeling:…110
Audience
Teachers1
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 61 to 75 of 110 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Henseler, Jorg; Chin, Wynne W. – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2010
In social and business sciences, the importance of the analysis of interaction effects between manifest as well as latent variables steadily increases. Researchers using partial least squares (PLS) to analyze interaction effects between latent variables need an overview of the available approaches as well as their suitability. This article…
Descriptors: Interaction, Least Squares Statistics, Computation, Prediction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Raykov, Tenko – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2009
A didactic discussion of a procedure for interval estimation of change in scale reliability due to revision is provided, which is developed within the framework of covariance structure modeling. The method yields ranges of plausible values for the population gain or loss in reliability of unidimensional composites, which results from deletion or…
Descriptors: Intervals, Computation, Reliability, Change
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Raykov, Tenko; Marcoulides, George A. – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2010
A latent variable modeling approach for examining population similarities and differences in observed variable relationship and mean indexes in incomplete data sets is discussed. The method is based on the full information maximum likelihood procedure of model fitting and parameter estimation. The procedure can be employed to test group identities…
Descriptors: Models, Comparative Analysis, Groups, Maximum Likelihood Statistics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hayduk, Leslie A. – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2009
In models containing reciprocal effects, or longer causal loops, the usual effect estimates assume that any effect touching a loop initiates an infinite cycling of effects around that loop. The real world, in contrast, might permit only finite feedback cycles. I use a simple hypothetical model to demonstrate that if the world permits only a few…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Feedback (Response), Computation, Statistical Bias
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mooijaart, Ab; Bentler, Peter M. – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2010
In the last decades there has been an increasing interest in nonlinear latent variable models. Since the seminal paper of Kenny and Judd, several methods have been proposed for dealing with these kinds of models. This article introduces an alternative approach. The methodology involves fitting some third-order moments in addition to the means and…
Descriptors: Computation, Statistical Analysis, Structural Equation Models, Maximum Likelihood Statistics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Savalei, Victoria; Bentler, Peter M. – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2009
A well-known ad-hoc approach to conducting structural equation modeling with missing data is to obtain a saturated maximum likelihood (ML) estimate of the population covariance matrix and then to use this estimate in the complete data ML fitting function to obtain parameter estimates. This 2-stage (TS) approach is appealing because it minimizes a…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Data, Computation, Maximum Likelihood Statistics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Leite, Walter L.; Sandbach, Robert; Jin, Rong; MacInnes, Jann W.; Jackman, M. Grace-Anne – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2012
Because random assignment is not possible in observational studies, estimates of treatment effects might be biased due to selection on observable and unobservable variables. To strengthen causal inference in longitudinal observational studies of multiple treatments, we present 4 latent growth models for propensity score matched groups, and…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Probability, Computation, Observation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yang-Wallentin, Fan; Joreskog, Karl G.; Luo, Hao – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2010
Ordinal variables are common in many empirical investigations in the social and behavioral sciences. Researchers often apply the maximum likelihood method to fit structural equation models to ordinal data. This assumes that the observed measures have normal distributions, which is not the case when the variables are ordinal. A better approach is…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Factor Analysis, Least Squares Statistics, Computation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
van de Schoot, Rens; Hoijtink, Herbert; Dekovic, Maja – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2010
Researchers often have expectations that can be expressed in the form of inequality constraints among the parameters of a structural equation model. It is currently not possible to test these so-called informative hypotheses in structural equation modeling software. We offer a solution to this problem using M"plus." The hypotheses are…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Computer Software, Hypothesis Testing, Statistical Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bollen, Kenneth A.; Davis, Walter R. – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2009
We discuss the identification, estimation, and testing of structural equation models that have causal indicators. We first provide 2 rules of identification that are particularly helpful in models with causal indicators--the 2C emitted paths rule and the exogenous X rule. We demonstrate how these rules can help us distinguish identified from…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Testing, Identification, Statistical Significance
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Peugh, James L.; Enders, Craig K. – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2010
Cluster sampling results in response variable variation both among respondents (i.e., within-cluster or Level 1) and among clusters (i.e., between-cluster or Level 2). Properly modeling within- and between-cluster variation could be of substantive interest in numerous settings, but applied researchers typically test only within-cluster (i.e.,…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Monte Carlo Methods, Multivariate Analysis, Sampling
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ryu, Ehri; West, Stephen G. – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2009
In multilevel structural equation modeling, the "standard" approach to evaluating the goodness of model fit has a potential limitation in detecting the lack of fit at the higher level. Level-specific model fit evaluation can address this limitation and is more informative in locating the source of lack of model fit. We proposed level-specific test…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Evaluation Methods, Goodness of Fit, Simulation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bai, Yun; Poon, Wai-Yin – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2009
Two-level data sets are frequently encountered in social and behavioral science research. They arise when observations are drawn from a known hierarchical structure, such as when individuals are randomly drawn from groups that are randomly drawn from a target population. Although 2-level data analysis in the context of structural equation modeling…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Data Analysis, Simulation, Goodness of Fit
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yuan, Ke-Hai; Kouros, Chrystyna D.; Kelley, Ken – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2008
When a covariance structure model is misspecified, parameter estimates will be affected. It is important to know which estimates are systematically affected and which are not. The approach of analyzing the path is both intuitive and informative for such a purpose. Different from path analysis, analyzing the path uses path tracing and elementary…
Descriptors: Computation, Structural Equation Models, Statistical Bias, Factor Structure
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Cheung, Mike W. -L. – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2009
Confidence intervals (CIs) for parameters are usually constructed based on the estimated standard errors. These are known as Wald CIs. This article argues that likelihood-based CIs (CIs based on likelihood ratio statistics) are often preferred to Wald CIs. It shows how the likelihood-based CIs and the Wald CIs for many statistics and psychometric…
Descriptors: Intervals, Structural Equation Models, Simulation, Correlation
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8