Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 5 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 29 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 29 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 68 |
Descriptor
Source
| Structural Equation Modeling:… | 76 |
Author
| Raykov, Tenko | 5 |
| Leite, Walter L. | 4 |
| Chunhua Cao | 3 |
| Kim De Roover | 3 |
| Bentler, Peter M. | 2 |
| Beretvas, S. Natasha | 2 |
| Depaoli, Sarah | 2 |
| Finch, W. Holmes | 2 |
| French, Brian F. | 2 |
| Hao Wu | 2 |
| Jackman, M. Grace-Anne | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 76 |
| Reports - Research | 50 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 14 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 12 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Grade 1 | 1 |
| Grade 2 | 1 |
| Grade 3 | 1 |
| Grade 4 | 1 |
| Grade 5 | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Germany | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Early Childhood Longitudinal… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Murphy, Daniel L.; Beretvas, S. Natasha; Pituch, Keenan A. – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2011
This simulation study examined the performance of the curve-of-factors model (COFM) when autocorrelation and growth processes were present in the first-level factor structure. In addition to the standard curve-of factors growth model, 2 new models were examined: one COFM that included a first-order autoregressive autocorrelation parameter, and a…
Descriptors: Sample Size, Simulation, Factor Structure, Statistical Analysis
DeMars, Christine E. – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2012
In structural equation modeling software, either limited-information (bivariate proportions) or full-information item parameter estimation routines could be used for the 2-parameter item response theory (IRT) model. Limited-information methods assume the continuous variable underlying an item response is normally distributed. For skewed and…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Structural Equation Models, Computation, Computer Software
Kelava, Augustin; Werner, Christina S.; Schermelleh-Engel, Karin; Moosbrugger, Helfried; Zapf, Dieter; Ma, Yue; Cham, Heining; Aiken, Leona S.; West, Stephen G. – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2011
Interaction and quadratic effects in latent variable models have to date only rarely been tested in practice. Traditional product indicator approaches need to create product indicators (e.g., x[superscript 2] [subscript 1], x[subscript 1]x[subscript 4]) to serve as indicators of each nonlinear latent construct. These approaches require the use of…
Descriptors: Simulation, Computation, Evaluation, Predictor Variables
Depaoli, Sarah – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2012
Parameter recovery was assessed within mixture confirmatory factor analysis across multiple estimator conditions under different simulated levels of mixture class separation. Mixture class separation was defined in the measurement model (through factor loadings) and the structural model (through factor variances). Maximum likelihood (ML) via the…
Descriptors: Markov Processes, Factor Analysis, Statistical Bias, Evaluation Research
Chen, Qi; Kwok, Oi-Man; Luo, Wen; Willson, Victor L. – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2010
Growth mixture modeling (GMM) is a relatively new technique for analyzing longitudinal data. However, when applying GMM, researchers might assume that the higher level (nonrepeated measure) units (e.g., students) are independent from each other even though it might not always be true. This article reports the results of a simulation study…
Descriptors: Longitudinal Studies, Data Analysis, Models, Monte Carlo Methods
Leite, Walter L.; Zuo, Youzhen – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2011
Among the many methods currently available for estimating latent variable interactions, the unconstrained approach is attractive to applied researchers because of its relatively easy implementation with any structural equation modeling (SEM) software. Using a Monte Carlo simulation study, we extended and evaluated the unconstrained approach to…
Descriptors: Monte Carlo Methods, Structural Equation Models, Evaluation, Researchers
Wen, Zhonglin; Marsh, Herbert W.; Hau, Kit-Tai – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2010
Standardized parameter estimates are routinely used to summarize the results of multiple regression models of manifest variables and structural equation models of latent variables, because they facilitate interpretation. Although the typical standardization of interaction terms is not appropriate for multiple regression models, straightforward…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Multiple Regression Analysis, Interaction, Computation
Raykov, Tenko; Penev, Spiridon – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2010
A latent variable analysis procedure for evaluation of reliability coefficients for 2-level models is outlined. The method provides point and interval estimates of group means' reliability, overall reliability of means, and conditional reliability. In addition, the approach can be used to test simple hypotheses about these parameters. The…
Descriptors: Reliability, Evaluation, Models, Intervals
Landsheer, J. A. – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2010
Tetrad IV is a program designed for the specification of causal models. It is specifically designed to search for causal relations, but also offers the possibility to estimate the parameters of a structural equation model. It offers a remarkable graphical user interface, which facilitates building, evaluating, and searching for causal models. The…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Causal Models, Evaluation, Mathematics
Mooijaart, Ab; Bentler, Peter M. – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2010
In the last decades there has been an increasing interest in nonlinear latent variable models. Since the seminal paper of Kenny and Judd, several methods have been proposed for dealing with these kinds of models. This article introduces an alternative approach. The methodology involves fitting some third-order moments in addition to the means and…
Descriptors: Computation, Statistical Analysis, Structural Equation Models, Maximum Likelihood Statistics
Leite, Walter L.; Sandbach, Robert; Jin, Rong; MacInnes, Jann W.; Jackman, M. Grace-Anne – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2012
Because random assignment is not possible in observational studies, estimates of treatment effects might be biased due to selection on observable and unobservable variables. To strengthen causal inference in longitudinal observational studies of multiple treatments, we present 4 latent growth models for propensity score matched groups, and…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Probability, Computation, Observation
Yang-Wallentin, Fan; Joreskog, Karl G.; Luo, Hao – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2010
Ordinal variables are common in many empirical investigations in the social and behavioral sciences. Researchers often apply the maximum likelihood method to fit structural equation models to ordinal data. This assumes that the observed measures have normal distributions, which is not the case when the variables are ordinal. A better approach is…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Factor Analysis, Least Squares Statistics, Computation
Bollen, Kenneth A.; Davis, Walter R. – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2009
We discuss the identification, estimation, and testing of structural equation models that have causal indicators. We first provide 2 rules of identification that are particularly helpful in models with causal indicators--the 2C emitted paths rule and the exogenous X rule. We demonstrate how these rules can help us distinguish identified from…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Testing, Identification, Statistical Significance
Peugh, James L.; Enders, Craig K. – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2010
Cluster sampling results in response variable variation both among respondents (i.e., within-cluster or Level 1) and among clusters (i.e., between-cluster or Level 2). Properly modeling within- and between-cluster variation could be of substantive interest in numerous settings, but applied researchers typically test only within-cluster (i.e.,…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Monte Carlo Methods, Multivariate Analysis, Sampling
Bai, Yun; Poon, Wai-Yin – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2009
Two-level data sets are frequently encountered in social and behavioral science research. They arise when observations are drawn from a known hierarchical structure, such as when individuals are randomly drawn from groups that are randomly drawn from a target population. Although 2-level data analysis in the context of structural equation modeling…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Data Analysis, Simulation, Goodness of Fit

Peer reviewed
Direct link
