Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 2 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 5 |
Descriptor
| Reliability | 5 |
| Sample Size | 5 |
| Structural Equation Models | 5 |
| Monte Carlo Methods | 3 |
| Goodness of Fit | 2 |
| Classification | 1 |
| Computation | 1 |
| Computer Software | 1 |
| Error of Measurement | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Factor Analysis | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Structural Equation Modeling:… | 5 |
Author
| Aaron T. McLaughlin | 1 |
| Daryl R. Van Tongeren | 1 |
| Frey, Marc P. | 1 |
| Green, Samuel B. | 1 |
| Hagemann, Dirk | 1 |
| Jackson, Dennis L. | 1 |
| Kevin J. Grimm | 1 |
| Meyerhoff, David | 1 |
| Phillip K. Wood | 1 |
| Russell P. Houpt | 1 |
| Voth, Jennifer | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 5 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Russell P. Houpt; Kevin J. Grimm; Aaron T. McLaughlin; Daryl R. Van Tongeren – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
Numerous methods exist to determine the optimal number of classes when using latent profile analysis (LPA), but none are consistently correct. Recently, the likelihood incremental percentage per parameter (LI3P) was proposed as a model effect-size measure. To evaluate the LI3P more thoroughly, we simulated 50,000 datasets, manipulating factors…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Profiles, Sample Size, Evaluation Methods
Phillip K. Wood – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
The logistic and confined exponential curves are frequently used in studies of growth and learning. These models, which are nonlinear in their parameters, can be estimated using structural equation modeling software. This paper proposes a single combined model, a weighted combination of both models. Mplus, Proc Calis, and lavaan code for the model…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Computation, Computer Software, Weighted Scores
Jackson, Dennis L.; Voth, Jennifer; Frey, Marc P. – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2013
Determining an appropriate sample size for use in latent variable modeling techniques has presented ongoing challenges to researchers. In particular, small sample sizes are known to present concerns over sampling error for the variances and covariances on which model estimation is based, as well as for fit indexes and convergence failures. The…
Descriptors: Sample Size, Factor Analysis, Measurement, Models
Yang, Yanyun; Green, Samuel B. – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2010
Reliability can be estimated using structural equation modeling (SEM). Two potential problems with this approach are that estimates may be unstable with small sample sizes and biased with misspecified models. A Monte Carlo study was conducted to investigate the quality of SEM estimates of reliability by themselves and relative to coefficient…
Descriptors: Monte Carlo Methods, Structural Equation Models, Reliability, Sample Size
Hagemann, Dirk; Meyerhoff, David – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2008
The latent state-trait (LST) theory is an extension of the classical test theory that allows one to decompose a test score into a true trait, a true state residual, and an error component. For practical applications, the variances of these latent variables may be estimated with standard methods of structural equation modeling (SEM). These…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Test Theory, Reliability, Sample Size

Peer reviewed
Direct link
