Descriptor
Source
| Small Group Behavior | 92 |
Author
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 34 |
| Reports - Research | 22 |
| Reports - General | 7 |
| Opinion Papers | 3 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Reference Materials -… | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| Canada | 2 |
| Israel | 2 |
| West Germany | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Personal Orientation Inventory | 1 |
| Tennessee Self Concept Scale | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedGouran, Dennis S.; Geonetta, Sam C. – Small Group Behavior, 1977
Examines the relationship between patterns of communication (in groups) and group outcomes. Specifically, it attempts to reveal contrasts in the structure of communication between groups whose consensual outcomes are dissimilar. (Author/HMV)
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, College Students, Communication (Thought Transfer), Group Discussion
Peer reviewedWahrman, Ralph – Small Group Behavior, 1977
This study examines a group's response to deviance and the connection between the group members' covert evaluations of the behavior and the overt sanctions imposed upon the deviant. (Author/YRJ)
Descriptors: Antisocial Behavior, Conformity, Group Dynamics, Group Status
Peer reviewedLustig, Myron W. – Small Group Behavior, 1987
Investigated reliability and dimensionality of Bales's Interpersonal Rating Forms (IRF) using volunteer subjects (N=266) enrolled in undergraduate communications course. Results documented shortcomings of IRF as a measuring instrument finding the subscales neither reliable nor dimensionally structured; only 2 of 18 items in each subscale are…
Descriptors: College Students, Group Behavior, Groups, Higher Education
Peer reviewedDuehn, Wayne D.; Mayadas, Nazneen S. – Small Group Behavior, 1976
Investigates the pattern of clients' precounseling expectancies, whether these differ for male and female clients, and the relationship between clients' expected content emphasis and the actual emphasis during counseling sessions. (Author)
Descriptors: Behavioral Science Research, Counseling Effectiveness, Group Counseling, Helping Relationship
Peer reviewedFreedman, Sharai M.; Hurley, John R. – Small Group Behavior, 1979
Findings suggest that peers' ratings of behavior of coparticipants in small, interpersonally oriented groups might yield valid data on how accepting the participants were of both others and self. An instrument designed to assess both self-acceptance and the acceptance of others in small groups was used to measure personality. (Author)
Descriptors: Group Dynamics, Groups, Individual Development, Interaction Process Analysis
Peer reviewedFisher, B. Aubrey – Small Group Behavior, 1979
Provides an insight into the group process of therapy and compares and contrasts the T-group process with therapy group process. The here-and-now orientation was present in T-group and therapy-group interaction. Greater relational conflict was present in the T-group. Members of the therapy group were much more defensive than members of the…
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Communication (Thought Transfer), Conflict, Group Behavior
Peer reviewedDesmond, Richard E.; Seligman, Milton – Small Group Behavior, 1977
Analyzes research studies of leaderless groups in terms of specific variables which seem to be important for each study. (Author)
Descriptors: Group Counseling, Group Dynamics, Group Therapy, Interaction Process Analysis
Peer reviewedEttin, Mark F. – Small Group Behavior, 1989
Sees introduction of specific structures and exercises in psychotherapy group as directly controlling course of events and affecting members' perceptions of the group and leader. Asserts that exercises must highlight, rather than bypass, existing group processes. Presents five-step model for preparing, working with, processing, generalizing, and…
Descriptors: Group Activities, Group Discussion, Group Dynamics, Group Guidance
Peer reviewedReddy, W. Brendan – Small Group Behavior, 1975
This article describes a study done to compare, quantitatively and qualitatively, the problem-solving and decision-making performance of four populations: business administration students, middle managers, elementary school teachers and elementary and secondary school principals. Results show business administration students and middle managers…
Descriptors: Administrators, Decision Making, Group Dynamics, Interaction Process Analysis
Peer reviewedWalker, David N. – Small Group Behavior, 1975
The nonverbal touching behavior of strangers in a dyadic interaction was studied to assess the current controversy between encounter group trainers and their critics concerning the use of nonverbal touching exercises to foster interpersonal openness. (Author)
Descriptors: Interaction Process Analysis, Interpersonal Relationship, Nonverbal Communication, Physical Activities
Peer reviewedSmith, Peter B. – Small Group Behavior, 1976
This research is based on the premise that sensitivity training effects are explicable in terms of processes of social influence. Subjects were participants in a residential 5-day training laboratory. Results indicated that no single strong source of influence could be discerned. Implications are discussed. (NG)
Descriptors: Group Dynamics, Identification (Psychology), Interaction Process Analysis, Research Projects
Peer reviewedShapiro, Ben Zion – Small Group Behavior, 1977
Examines some of the conditions associated with dissolution of the friendship tie. Subjects were 232 boys and girls between the ages of eight and 15 at a summer camp. The hypothesis that reduction in social interaction would be associated with increased probability of dissolution was not conclusively supported. (Author/HMV)
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Friendship, Interaction Process Analysis, Interpersonal Relationship
Peer reviewedRuhe, John; Eatman, John – Small Group Behavior, 1977
Evaluates the effect of integration and segregation of Blacks and whites in a small group setting in a work environment. Discriminant analysis suggests that while few behavioral and attitudinal differences exist between Blacks and whites, integration is beneficial to Blacks and not detrimental to whites. (Author)
Descriptors: Biracial Committees, Group Dynamics, Interaction Process Analysis, Racial Composition
Peer reviewedKlemke, Lloyd W. – Small Group Behavior, 1977
This paper focuses on how the sociological perspective can make significant contributions in providing a meaningful conceptual framework for analyzing self concept changes. Insight in explaining why only certain kinds of limited changes typically occur among sensitivity group participants is presented. (Author)
Descriptors: Behavior Change, Group Discussion, Group Experience, Interaction Process Analysis
Peer reviewedWilcox, Judith; Mitchell, John – Small Group Behavior, 1977
This study examines the effects of short term group interaction on self-esteem levels of the group members. (Author)
Descriptors: Group Dynamics, Group Membership, Individual Differences, Interaction Process Analysis


