Descriptor
Source
| Small Group Behavior | 92 |
Author
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 34 |
| Reports - Research | 22 |
| Reports - General | 7 |
| Opinion Papers | 3 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Reference Materials -… | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| Canada | 2 |
| Israel | 2 |
| West Germany | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Personal Orientation Inventory | 1 |
| Tennessee Self Concept Scale | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedPutnam, Linda L. – Small Group Behavior, 1983
Examines procedural messages and group work habits of 20 three-person groups, 10 who preferred a tightly structured work cliamte and 10 who preferred a free-associative work routine. Results revealed that structured groups used abstract headings that organized group talk, while free-associative groups used specific details on a content-related…
Descriptors: College Students, Communication Skills, Efficiency, Group Dynamics
Peer reviewedTindall, Jeffry – Small Group Behavior, 1979
Time-limited and time-extended groups studied appeared to be similar in stage development with abnormalities in process accounted for by the amount of time the groups have continuously met. Support was given to the concept of stages as a series of cyclical movements characterized by clusterings of related behaviors. (Author)
Descriptors: Developmental Stages, Group Behavior, Group Therapy, Groups
Peer reviewedMamola, Claire – Small Group Behavior, 1979
Reviews the research dealing with women in leadership roles within groups of both sexes. Some research indicates a reluctance of women to assume leadership roles. Other findings indicate women are more likely to be strong leaders when the task solution is given. (LPG)
Descriptors: Females, Group Dynamics, Interaction Process Analysis, Leadership Styles
Peer reviewedWeinstein, Malcolm S.; Hanson, Robert – Small Group Behavior, 1975
This study is an initial report in a research program to examine the nature and influence of one set of structural variables--participation patterns--on patterns of interaction in sensitivity training groups. (Author)
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Experience, Group Dynamics, Interaction Process Analysis
Peer reviewedBales, Robert R. – Small Group Behavior, 1976
The four papers presented here include a study of group communication process among college students, a developmental analysis of social interaction, an analysis of environmental impact on interaction, and a methodological discussion of ways of studying interaction. These papers are followed by series of three discussion papers. (PS)
Descriptors: Conferences, Group Dynamics, Group Structure, Interaction
Peer reviewedLundgren, David C. – Small Group Behavior, 1977
The current study analyses developmental trends in sensitivity training groups by exploring the sequence of interpersonal issues or problem areas which emerge at different periods in the life span of such groups. (Author)
Descriptors: Group Discussion, Group Dynamics, Interaction Process Analysis, Interpersonal Competence
Peer reviewedHare, A. Paul; Naveh, David – Small Group Behavior, 1986
President Carter's description of his negotiations with President Sadat of Egypt and Prime Minister Begin of Israel at Camp David in 1978 was coded to illustrate the extent to which levels of creativity and types of pressures toward conformity were involved. Two sets of categories were used. (Author/ABB)
Descriptors: Conformity, Creativity, Foreign Countries, Interaction Process Analysis
Peer reviewedDeJulio, Steven; And Others – Small Group Behavior, 1979
Compared the effects of traditional group norming techniques with a method where suggested norms are explicitly outlined at the beginning of the group. Data were analyzed to discover if there were significant differences between traditional norm groups and suggested norm groups in amount of interaction. (Author)
Descriptors: Disclosure, Group Dynamics, Group Norms, Groups
Peer reviewedShaw, Marvin E.; And Others – Small Group Behavior, 1979
Data show that giving information to members of a group is more important in determining the perception by others that the person is facilitating group performance. Asking for information and opinions is more important in actual facilitation of group learning. Social-emotional support becomes important after initial phases of group interaction.…
Descriptors: Group Behavior, Group Dynamics, Interaction Process Analysis, Learning Theories
Peer reviewedSmith, Darrell; Miller, Roger – Small Group Behavior, 1979
Confirms that leadership variables are the most potent determinants of group effectiveness. Anglo female leaders are most effective although sex is not the basic determinant. Language is an influential variable. Group effectiveness is not dependent on cultural matching of members and leaders. (Author/BEF)
Descriptors: Anglo Americans, Counselor Role, Individual Development, Interaction Process Analysis
Peer reviewedO'Day, Rory – Small Group Behavior, 1976
This report focuses on differences in training style among four trainers as measured by the Training Style Scoring System. The study concludes that supportive and trusting interrelations between members develop when the leader permits open expression of hostility toward his/herself. The difficulty of allowing this is noted. (NG)
Descriptors: Classification, Group Experience, Individual Differences, Interaction Process Analysis
Peer reviewedWilliams, J. Sherwood; And Others – Small Group Behavior, 1976
This paper analyzes development of group structure in terms of the stimulus-sampling perspective. Learning is the continual sampling of possibilities, with those reinforced possibilities increasing in probability of occurance. This contingency learning approach is tested experimentally. (NG)
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Group Dynamics, Group Structure, Interaction Process Analysis
Peer reviewedWalker, Thomas G. – Small Group Behavior, 1976
The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of varying leader selection systems on the performance of political decision-making groups (judges). The type of leadership choice of the court was the independent variable and degree of dissent the dependent variable. As predicted, merit choice had less dissent. (NG)
Descriptors: Decision Making, Group Behavior, Group Dynamics, Interaction Process Analysis
Peer reviewedPatterson, Miles L.; Schaeffer, Russell E. – Small Group Behavior, 1977
Examines the influence of the size and sex composition of groups on their spatial arrangements. Additional concerns involve the examination of the relationships between group size and satisfaction, and the possible identification of predictors of satisfaction in groups. (Author)
Descriptors: Group Dynamics, Interaction Process Analysis, Organization Size (Groups), Research Projects
Peer reviewedMangham, Iain – Small Group Behavior, 1977
Presents a model of interaction and considers the implications of part of that model for intervention processes in T-group training. (Author)
Descriptors: Feedback, Group Dynamics, Interaction Process Analysis, Interpersonal Relationship


