NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 12 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lewis, Benjamin F. – Small Group Behavior, 1978
Much of the material presented here derives from a study of the termination phase of group development undertaken to test the validity of a portion of a stages model developed by Garland, Kolodny, and Jones (1965). This model for stages of group development postulates five stages of group life. (Author)
Descriptors: Development, Group Behavior, Groups, Research Projects
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Shaw, Marvin E.; And Others – Small Group Behavior, 1979
Data show that giving information to members of a group is more important in determining the perception by others that the person is facilitating group performance. Asking for information and opinions is more important in actual facilitation of group learning. Social-emotional support becomes important after initial phases of group interaction.…
Descriptors: Group Behavior, Group Dynamics, Interaction Process Analysis, Learning Theories
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Walker, Thomas G. – Small Group Behavior, 1976
The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of varying leader selection systems on the performance of political decision-making groups (judges). The type of leadership choice of the court was the independent variable and degree of dissent the dependent variable. As predicted, merit choice had less dissent. (NG)
Descriptors: Decision Making, Group Behavior, Group Dynamics, Interaction Process Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Berger, Stephen E.; Anchor, Kenneth N. – Small Group Behavior, 1978
People who have less prior knowledge of others in a group give more personal information. In dyads low-prior knowers give and receive more personal statements than high-prior knowers. Therapists can support confiding personal information about his/her self. (MFD)
Descriptors: Group Behavior, Group Dynamics, Helping Relationship, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bradley, Patricia Hayes – Small Group Behavior, 1978
This study suggests female and male verbal behavior should be viewed separately when analysing task-importance. Ego-involvement works with task importance to create atmospheres of maximum involvement. Characteristics of communication and group pressure for uniformity are identified. (MFD)
Descriptors: Conformity, Group Behavior, Group Dynamics, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Edney, Julian J.; Uhlig, Susan R. – Small Group Behavior, 1977
Explores the reactions of single persons and small groups-each in a room they had territorialized- and to compare these against the reactions of singles and small groups who were in a comparable room which they had not territorialized. (Author)
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Comparative Analysis, Environmental Influences, Group Behavior
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lundgren, David C.; Knight, David J. – Small Group Behavior, 1977
Examines the role of interpersonal needs for control and affection in influencing members' attitudinal reactions to the trainer and the group. Results indicate no support for the two-stage, authority-intimacy sequence suggested by much of the research on group development. (Author)
Descriptors: Attitudes, Group Behavior, Group Dynamics, Helping Relationship
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Dies, Robert R. – Small Group Behavior, 1978
This research evaluates why individuals seek out or avoid encounter groups. The most important reasons for participation include; self-understanding, overcoming specific problems and learning to express feelings. Reluctance may come from lack of trust and fear of losing control. (MFD)
Descriptors: Attitudes, Emotional Response, Feedback, Group Behavior
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Adelson, Joseph P. – Small Group Behavior, 1975
The role of feedback in T-groups was studied. Results indicate that feedback increases as T-groups progress, feedback is more emotional and non-evaluative than cognitive in nature, positive and direct feedback to the leaders increases as the group develops, and specific feedback between members increases as groups progress. (SE)
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, College Students, Feedback, Group Behavior
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Wogan, Michael; And Others – Small Group Behavior, 1977
Tests the hypothesis that cognitive-experiential pretraining is beneficial in promoting openness and honesty among members of a psychotherapy group. The hypothesis is supported. (HMV)
Descriptors: College Students, Comparative Analysis, Counseling Effectiveness, Group Behavior
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Pattinson, Pamela R.; And Others – Small Group Behavior, 1977
The present study examines the effects of immediate feedback to the therapist. It was hypothesized that immediate feedback would increase the amount of therapeutic talk by the therapist, as defined by the HIM. (Author)
Descriptors: Feedback, Group Behavior, Health Personnel, Helping Relationship
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Armstrong, Stephen; Roback, Howard – Small Group Behavior, 1977
This study, employing inclusion, control, and affection as independent variables, tests empirically Schutz' (1958) three-dimensional theory of group process, using a Prisoner's Dilemma experimental analogue situation with dyads. (Author)
Descriptors: Adolescents, Attachment Behavior, Behavior Patterns, Behavioral Science Research