NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 5 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hare, A. Paul; Naveh, David – Small Group Behavior, 1985
Draws examples of creative problem solving from the negotiations by delegations from Egypt, Israel, and the United States at Camp David in 1978. Uses Bales's "Field Diagrams" to show the relationships of the participants. Uses Taylor's five levels of creativity to rate decisions. (BH)
Descriptors: Case Studies, Conflict Resolution, Creativity, Diagrams
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Tindall, Jeffry H.; And Others – Small Group Behavior, 1982
Examined the interaction patterns of adult creative problem solvers within small, leaderless groups. Presented divergent thinking problems to two groups and categorized their discussions. Results indicated the creative person plays a central role in determining task-oriented directions by initiating and receiving more orienting behaviors. (RC)
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Creativity, Group Dynamics, Individual Characteristics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Reddy, W. Brendan – Small Group Behavior, 1975
This article describes a study done to compare, quantitatively and qualitatively, the problem-solving and decision-making performance of four populations: business administration students, middle managers, elementary school teachers and elementary and secondary school principals. Results show business administration students and middle managers…
Descriptors: Administrators, Decision Making, Group Dynamics, Interaction Process Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hazell, Joseph William – Small Group Behavior, 1975
The author describes a technique used in encounter groups, called query, which is action oriented and aims at promoting the self insight of group members. Asking questions of one another and role playing are two major aspects of the technique described. (SE)
Descriptors: Affective Behavior, Feedback, Group Dynamics, Group Structure
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
DeStephen, Rolayne S. – Small Group Behavior, 1983
Analyzed the complete interaction of high and low consensus groups in a basic small group course. Interaction analysis indicated that both the relational and content levels of communication are significantly different for high versus low consensus groups. The conclusion that increased feedback leads to decision satisfaction was confirmed. (JAC)
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Communication (Thought Transfer), Comparative Testing, Decision Making