Descriptor
| Group Behavior | 5 |
| Interpersonal Communication | 5 |
| Group Dynamics | 4 |
| College Students | 2 |
| Group Unity | 2 |
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Metaphors | 2 |
| Anxiety | 1 |
| Case Studies | 1 |
| Communication Research | 1 |
| Content Analysis | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Small Group Behavior | 5 |
Author
| Boyd, Robert D. | 1 |
| Davies, Don | 1 |
| Jacobs, Alfred | 1 |
| McClure, Bud A. | 1 |
| Owen, William Foster | 1 |
| Shadish, William R., Jr. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 5 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Reports - General | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| Netherlands | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedOwen, William Foster – Small Group Behavior, 1985
Metaphorical analysis of small group interactions enables researchers and practitioners to isolate, identify, and intervene with the current social reality of the group. This heuristic study offers one view of the specific meaning structures which account for the development of group cohesiveness. (BL)
Descriptors: Content Analysis, Group Behavior, Group Unity, Interaction
Peer reviewedBoyd, Robert D. – Small Group Behavior, 1983
Discusses the development and description of a comprehensive framework to explain small group behavior labeled the Matrix Model. Argues that a synthesis of knowledge from the adaptive, developmental, structural, transactional, and gestalt points of view will provide a more meaningful and useful understanding of small groups. (LLL)
Descriptors: Communication Research, Discussion Groups, Group Behavior, Group Dynamics
Peer reviewedMcClure, Bud A. – Small Group Behavior, 1989
Urges caution in illuminating and interpreting spontaneous group metaphors. Encourages metaphor amplification as less intrusive means for using this therapeutic tool. Provides case examples to support discussion. (Author/CM)
Descriptors: Anxiety, Case Studies, Counseling Techniques, Group Behavior
Peer reviewedDavies, Don; Jacobs, Alfred – Small Group Behavior, 1985
To assess the effect of feedback combinations in group interactions, 28 college students participated in a two hour workshop and then completed feedback ratings. Results indicated differences in credibility, desirability, cohesion, and evaluation, with the positive-negative-positive feedback combination being most effective. (BL)
Descriptors: College Students, Credibility, Feedback, Group Behavior
Peer reviewedShadish, William R., Jr. – Small Group Behavior, 1984
Developed three measures of clinical group benefits and presented empirical evidence (N=27) explicating the logic of the Interpersonal Relations Scale as an assessment device. Conceptualized the benefits of clinical groups as the fostering of intimacy skills by which group members learn about themselves, others, and their interpersonal…
Descriptors: College Students, Counseling Effectiveness, Group Behavior, Group Dynamics


