Descriptor
Source
| Small Group Behavior | 8 |
Author
| Burlingame, Gary | 1 |
| Hill, W. Fawcett | 1 |
| O'Day, Rory | 1 |
| Powell, Evan R. | 1 |
| Silbergeld, Sam | 1 |
| Sisson, C. J. | 1 |
| Trujillo, Nick | 1 |
| Uhlemann, Max R. | 1 |
| Weigel, Richard G. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Reports - General | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedBurlingame, Gary; And Others – Small Group Behavior, 1984
Proposes a multidimensional system based on commonly used measurement parameters in group research. Combines and crosses four dimensions describing the who, what, how, and when, of process measurement as a first step toward an orderly classification system. (Author/LLL)
Descriptors: Classification, Group Dynamics, Interaction Process Analysis
Peer reviewedTrujillo, Nick – Small Group Behavior, 1986
Presents an exploratory taxonomy of small group interaction-coding systems. Six dimensions that characterize interaction-coding schemes are presented in a hierarchical order ranging from abstract conceptual issues to specific methodological ones. These dimensions are: philosophical perspective, conceptual and operational focus, observer inference,…
Descriptors: Classification, Communication Research, Group Dynamics, Interaction
Peer reviewedPowell, Evan R. – Small Group Behavior, 1977
This study uses two methods of analysis to examine the degree to which items within the cells of the Hill Interaction Matrix correlate. It is found that the table of specifications does not hold up. But the author recommends caution in interpreting this finding. (Author/BP)
Descriptors: Classification, Conceptual Schemes, Correlation, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewedO'Day, Rory – Small Group Behavior, 1976
This report focuses on differences in training style among four trainers as measured by the Training Style Scoring System. The study concludes that supportive and trusting interrelations between members develop when the leader permits open expression of hostility toward his/herself. The difficulty of allowing this is noted. (NG)
Descriptors: Classification, Group Experience, Individual Differences, Interaction Process Analysis
Peer reviewedHill, W. Fawcett – Small Group Behavior, 1977
Essentially, the HIM is a systematic set of categories developed for use in understanding and classifying interaction in small groups, especially therapy groups. It has, however, been used not only on T-groups, encounter groups, discussion groups, and such, but also on individual and dyadic counseling sessions. (Author)
Descriptors: Bibliographies, Classification, Conceptual Schemes, Group Dynamics
Peer reviewedUhlemann, Max R.; Weigel, Richard G. – Small Group Behavior, 1977
This study evaluated behavior change occurring after a marathon group experience, with a focus on individualized rather than shared behavioral change criteria. The individualization of behavior change criteria is based on the assertion that few, if any, single change criteria are appropriate or realistic for assessing change in all individuals.…
Descriptors: Behavior Change, Classification, College Students, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewedSilbergeld, Sam; And Others – Small Group Behavior, 1977
To assess two group models being developed in the Mental Health Study Center, NIMH, this paper compares HIM data from these models with norms from a previous study. By contrasting HIM results from groups of married couples, young adolescents, and parents and teachers, one obtains a better understanding of the effectiveness of these models. (Author)
Descriptors: Classification, Comparative Analysis, Evaluation Methods, Group Dynamics
Peer reviewedSisson, C. J.; And Others – Small Group Behavior, 1977
The purpose of this investigation is to compare the descriptions of group process obtained from the Hill Interaction Matrix (Form G) and the Bonney Scale in rating an extended counseling group of psychiatric residents (N = 10). (Author)
Descriptors: Classification, Comparative Analysis, Conceptual Schemes, Graduate Students


