NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 10 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Waltman, Douglas E.; Zimpfer, David G. – Small Group Behavior, 1988
Used meta-analysis to examine duration of group experience and structure provided by leader in counseling groups from 26 studies. Group composition appeared to have greatest effect in unstructured group which was relatively long in duration. Leaders using short-term, structured groups may be less concerned with composition, as its potential effect…
Descriptors: Group Counseling, Group Membership, Group Structure, Leadership
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Edney, Julian J.; Grundmann, Michael J. – Small Group Behavior, 1979
The results suggested group space boundaries increased with group size (from groups of one to two to four) if group members were strangers, but not if group members were friends. The only nonspatial variable found to correlate with boundary size was personal identity. (Author)
Descriptors: Friendship, Group Structure, Groups, Interpersonal Relationship
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gruner, LeRoy – Small Group Behavior, 1984
Contrasts open and closed therapeutic groups in the context of group development research, and reanalyzes data applying the Hill Interaction Matrix. Results supported the existence of a discernable process of development in the closed groups, while open groups with residual members showed counterproductive activity. (LLL)
Descriptors: Counselor Role, Counselors, Group Dynamics, Group Membership
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Farrell, Michael P. – Small Group Behavior, 1979
This study first investigates the effects of group structure on collective projections in groups, then examines how collective projections feed back and affect group structure. It examines the effects of having a deviant in a group on group projections and responses. (Author)
Descriptors: Affective Behavior, Antisocial Behavior, Group Norms, Group Structure
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Falk, Gideon – Small Group Behavior, 1981
Uses a laboratory experiment involving role-playing groups to show that an assigned majority rule is likely to lead to higher-quality solutions than unanimity and no-decision rule. Results indicated under majority rule workers resistance to the foreman's power often resulted in a successful search for a better solution. (JAC)
Descriptors: Decision Making, Group Dynamics, Group Structure, Groups
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Fuehrer, Ann; Keys, Christopher – Small Group Behavior, 1988
Examined applicability of Bednar, Melnick, and Kaul's model of early group development to college student self-help groups using undergraduates (N=101) who met in high-structure or low-structure groups. Found amount of group structure was positively related to ownership of group functioning; importance of performing group behaviors was positively…
Descriptors: College Students, Group Behavior, Group Counseling, Group Dynamics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kakabadse, Andrew – Small Group Behavior, 1986
Investigated relationship between aspects of organizational structure and alienation as experienced by personnel (N=603) employed in nine social services organizations. Interviews with personnel making executive decisions, those making supervisory assessments, and those concerned with client interaction revealed that the best predictions of…
Descriptors: Administrative Organization, Alienation, Centralization, Employee Attitudes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Tziner, Aharon E. – Small Group Behavior, 1986
Two social psychological theories--similarity theory and equity theory--are employed to elucidate the relationship between group members' abilities and group performance on tasks involving high levels of interdependence. Contrasting hypotheses are drawn regarding specific ability compositions that should evoke performance above or below the simple…
Descriptors: Ability, Foreign Countries, Group Behavior, Group Structure
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Piper, William E.; And Others – Small Group Behavior, 1984
Experimentally varied conditions relating to the people with whom participants (N=45) interacted prior to beginning a small learning group experience. Results showed that rates of attending and remaining varied according to with whom participants interacted prior to the onset of the group. (LLL)
Descriptors: Adults, Attachment Behavior, Dropout Characteristics, Foreign Countries
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Powell, Evan R. – Small Group Behavior, 1982
Focused on applying a variation of the semantic differential technique (SD) to changes in group structure over time and treatment. Members (N=29) of two T groups rated their respective group members on an SD form. Results showed acceptance of members increased as the groups progressed. (RC)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, College Students, Factor Structure, Group Dynamics