Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Receptive Language | 4 |
| Deafness | 3 |
| Adolescents | 2 |
| American Sign Language | 2 |
| Sign Language | 2 |
| Age Differences | 1 |
| Autism | 1 |
| Child Language | 1 |
| Children | 1 |
| Classroom Communication | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Sign Language Studies | 4 |
Author
| Swisher, M. Virginia | 2 |
| Konstantareas, M. Mary | 1 |
| Leibovitz, Sandi F. | 1 |
| Tevenal, Stephanie | 1 |
| Villanueva, Miako | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 4 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| District of Columbia | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Tevenal, Stephanie; Villanueva, Miako – Sign Language Studies, 2009
When hearing speakers address a mixed audience of hearing and deaf participants,[1] they have a choice of three methods by which to convey the information in their presentation. They may choose to use English and provide an English-to-ASL interpreter, use ASL and provide an ASL-to-English interpreter, or use simultaneous communication (SimCom).…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Partial Hearing, Deafness, American Sign Language
Peer reviewedSwisher, M. Virginia; And Others – Sign Language Studies, 1989
Investigation of profoundly deaf adolescent students' ability to read signs in peripheral vision revealed a mean success rate of about 80 percent. Results support the supposition that peripheral vision may be linguistically and communicatively useful for deaf people, particularly as signs in isolation are more difficult to read than signs in…
Descriptors: Adolescents, Deafness, Language Processing, Receptive Language
Peer reviewedKonstantareas, M. Mary; Leibovitz, Sandi F. – Sign Language Studies, 1981
Compares the effectiveness of a visual only approach (mouthing and signing) with a simultaneous visual and auditory approach (signing and speaking) in teaching autistic-like children to communicate. Results suggest the simultaneous approach may be superior. In addition, receptive abilities precede expressive. Implications of therapeutic…
Descriptors: Autism, Children, Language Acquisition, Language Research
Peer reviewedSwisher, M. Virginia – Sign Language Studies, 1990
Replication of a study that showed that deaf 15- to 18-year- olds could accurately identify a significant number of isolated signs presented well out in peripheral vision found that 8- to 12-year-olds could also identify such signs, although results showed a significant effect of age on performance. (Author/CB)
Descriptors: Adolescents, Age Differences, American Sign Language, Child Language

Direct link
