Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Source
| Roeper Review | 16 |
Author
| Fishkin, Anne S. | 2 |
| Carri, Louis | 1 |
| Chowkase, Aakash | 1 |
| Cress, Alissa | 1 |
| Cropley, Arthur J. | 1 |
| Desmet, Ophélie Allyssa | 1 |
| Ford, Donna Y. | 1 |
| Gentry, Marcia | 1 |
| Glascoe, Frances P. | 1 |
| Gray, Anne | 1 |
| Green, Corinne | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 16 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 6 |
| Reports - Research | 6 |
| Opinion Papers | 3 |
| Book/Product Reviews | 1 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - General | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 4 |
| Practitioners | 2 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Wechsler Intelligence Scale… | 2 |
| Raven Progressive Matrices | 1 |
| Woodcock Johnson Psycho… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Gentry, Marcia; Desmet, Ophélie Allyssa; Karami, Sareh; Lee, Hyeseong; Green, Corinne; Cress, Alissa; Chowkase, Aakash; Gray, Anne – Roeper Review, 2021
In this article, we reviewed how intelligence tests were developed and normed, with a careful eye to underserved groups. Based on state recommendations, five group-administered and five individually-administered tests were reviewed for demographics; invariance testing; validity and reliability reporting; and gifted identification suitability. We…
Descriptors: Gifted Education, High Stakes Tests, Ability Identification, Measures (Individuals)
Misconceptions about the Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test: A Commentary of Concerns and Disagreements
Naglieri, Jack A.; Ford, Donna Y. – Roeper Review, 2015
Black and Hispanic students are undeniably underidentified as gifted and underrepresented in gifted education. The underrepresentation of the two largest groups of "minority" students is long-standing, dating several decades, and is a serious area of contention. Most debates focus on the efficacy of traditional intelligence tests with…
Descriptors: Misconceptions, Nonverbal Ability, Ability, Ability Identification
Peer reviewedMacRae, LaDonna; Lupart, Judy L. – Roeper Review, 1991
This article summarizes Renzulli's Revolving Door Identification Model, an approach to the identification of gifted and talented students. It then investigates reasons for its popularity, addresses criticisms leveled against the model, and assesses its validity and utility for identifying and serving gifted students. (Author/JDD)
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Gifted
Peer reviewedMantzicopoulos, Panayota Y. – Roeper Review, 2000
The accuracy of the Brigance K&1 Screen in the early identification of Head Start children with possible cognitive/academic giftedness was explored with 134 children, 13 of whom were identified as potentially gifted on the K-ABC. These potentially gifted children also performed significantly better on the Brigance than did other children.…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Early Identification, Gifted, Grade 1
Peer reviewedMather, Nancy; Udall, Anne J. – Roeper Review, 1985
Performance of 46 gifted and talented elementary students as displayed on the Achievement-Aptitude Profile of the Woodcock-Johnson Psycho Educational Battery suggested that the test is useful for identifying and assessing this population. The Woodcock-Johnson and the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised appeared to have concurrent…
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Gifted, Talent Identification, Test Use
Peer reviewedMale, Robert A.; Perrone, Philip – Roeper Review, 1980
The final part of an article on the process of identifying gifted and talented children presents data and discusses implications of the use of the Guidance Institute for Talented Students' Screening Instrument (GIFTS). (For Parts 1 and 2, see EJ 216 146 and EJ 221 686.) (PHR)
Descriptors: Creativity Tests, Elementary Secondary Education, Gifted, Screening Tests
Peer reviewedSevier, Robert; And Others – Roeper Review, 1994
Thirty-five gifted elementary children were tested with the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children III (WISC-III) and results were compared to a previous administration of the WISC (Revised). Scores were significantly higher on all three WISC-R global scales and most subtest scaled scores. Correlation coefficients between the tests were…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Comparative Testing, Correlation, Elementary Education
Peer reviewedCropley, Arthur J. – Roeper Review, 2000
This article argues that creativity tests are best thought of as measures of creative potential because creative achievement depends on additional factors not measured by creativity tests, such as technical skill, field knowledge, mental health, and opportunity. The need for assessment to be based on several tests is emphasized. (Contains…
Descriptors: Adults, Children, Creative Thinking, Creativity
Peer reviewedKirschenbaum, Robert J. – Roeper Review, 1986
Four dimensions (Contact, Consciousness, Interest, and Fantasy) of the Creativity Classification System (CCS) have demonstrated high validity in identifying fourth- to sixth-grade students for an enrichment program. An identification procedure for use at the high school level is explained in relation to CCS. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Behavior Rating Scales, Classification, Creativity, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewedGlascoe, Frances P. – Roeper Review, 1996
Children (n=408) age 21-84 months were assessed to investigate the validity of the BRIGANCE Screens in comparison with criterion tests in identifying children who are gifted and talented. Results found that using the BRIGANCE screens in combination with teacher/examiner ratings produced high rates of sensitivity in identifying gifted children. (CR)
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Academically Gifted, Early Childhood Education, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewedTyler-Wood, Tandra; Carri, Louis – Roeper Review, 1991
This study examined the scores obtained by 21 elementary-level gifted students on 4 different intellectual measures--Stanford-Binet (LM), Stanford-Binet (Fourth Edition), Otis-Lennon School Abilities Test, and the Cognitive Abilities Test. Results showed that the population of gifted students identified will vary greatly depending upon which test…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Cognitive Ability, Elementary Education, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewedMoore, Sara Delano – Roeper Review, 1993
This review of the Screening Assessment for Gifted Elementary Students (SAGES) and the Screening Assessment for Gifted Elementary Students-Primary (SAGES-P) looks at test content, utility, and technical considerations. The tests are commended for their provision of gifted norms. Some reservations about the tests' validity and reliability data are…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Elementary Education, Gifted, Norm Referenced Tests
Peer reviewedStinespring, John A. – Roeper Review, 1991
A culture-specific approach to identifying artistic talent in African-American students is presented, called Tactuality. Tactuality identifies four characteristics: emotional intensity, flexibility and open-endedness, holistic perception, and tactile sensitivity. A pilot test with 63 fourth graders resulted in statistical problems with validation.…
Descriptors: Black Students, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Talent
Peer reviewedFishkin, Anne S.; And Others – Roeper Review, 1996
This study investigated patterns of Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC) Third Edition subtest scores for 42 gifted children in grades 4-8. Variability from subtest means was highest on Similarities, Comprehension, Coding, and Symbol Search subtests. Significant weaknesses were found on the Block Design subtest, seen as a peak subtest…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Cluster Analysis, Elementary Secondary Education, Gifted
Peer reviewedFishkin, Anne S.; Johnson, Aileen S. – Roeper Review, 1998
This article examines assessment instruments, measurement considerations, and factors that affect understanding of a child's creativity. It compares strengths and weaknesses of methods of assessing creativity and lists more than 60 standardized assessment measures. Procedures for using formal and informal measures in the decision-making process…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Children, Creativity, Divergent Thinking
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1 | 2
Direct link
