NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 6 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hans-Peter Piepho; Johannes Forkman; Waqas Ahmed Malik – Research Synthesis Methods, 2024
Checking for possible inconsistency between direct and indirect evidence is an important task in network meta-analysis. Recently, an evidence-splitting (ES) model has been proposed, that allows separating direct and indirect evidence in a network and hence assessing inconsistency. A salient feature of this model is that the variance for…
Descriptors: Maximum Likelihood Statistics, Evidence, Networks, Meta Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Korevaar, Elizabeth; Turner, Simon L.; Forbes, Andrew B.; Karahalios, Amalia; Taljaard, Monica; McKenzie, Joanne E. – Research Synthesis Methods, 2023
Interrupted time series (ITS) are often meta-analysed to inform public health and policy decisions but examination of the statistical methods for ITS analysis and meta-analysis in this context is limited. We simulated meta-analyses of ITS studies with continuous outcome data, analysed the studies using segmented linear regression with two…
Descriptors: Meta Analysis, Maximum Likelihood Statistics, Factor Analysis, Public Health
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Langan, Dean; Higgins, Julian P. T.; Jackson, Dan; Bowden, Jack; Veroniki, Areti Angeliki; Kontopantelis, Evangelos; Viechtbauer, Wolfgang; Simmonds, Mark – Research Synthesis Methods, 2019
Studies combined in a meta-analysis often have differences in their design and conduct that can lead to heterogeneous results. A random-effects model accounts for these differences in the underlying study effects, which includes a heterogeneity variance parameter. The DerSimonian-Laird method is often used to estimate the heterogeneity variance,…
Descriptors: Simulation, Meta Analysis, Health, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jackson, Dan; Veroniki, Areti Angeliki; Law, Martin; Tricco, Andrea C.; Baker, Rose – Research Synthesis Methods, 2017
Network meta-analysis is used to simultaneously compare multiple treatments in a single analysis. However, network meta-analyses may exhibit inconsistency, where direct and different forms of indirect evidence are not in agreement with each other, even after allowing for between-study heterogeneity. Models for network meta-analysis with random…
Descriptors: Meta Analysis, Network Analysis, Comparative Analysis, Outcomes of Treatment
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Veroniki, Areti Angeliki; Jackson, Dan; Viechtbauer, Wolfgang; Bender, Ralf; Bowden, Jack; Knapp, Guido; Kuss, Oliver; Higgins, Julian P. T.; Langan, Dean; Salanti, Georgia – Research Synthesis Methods, 2016
Meta-analyses are typically used to estimate the overall/mean of an outcome of interest. However, inference about between-study variability, which is typically modelled using a between-study variance parameter, is usually an additional aim. The DerSimonian and Laird method, currently widely used by default to estimate the between-study variance,…
Descriptors: Meta Analysis, Methods, Computation, Simulation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Trikalinos, Thomas A.; Hoaglin, David C.; Small, Kevin M.; Terrin, Norma; Schmid, Christopher H. – Research Synthesis Methods, 2014
Existing methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy focus primarily on a single index test. We propose models for the joint meta-analysis of studies comparing multiple index tests on the same participants in paired designs. These models respect the grouping of data by studies, account for the within-study correlation between the tests'…
Descriptors: Meta Analysis, Diagnostic Tests, Accuracy, Comparative Analysis