Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 2 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 3 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
| Error of Measurement | 3 |
| Maximum Likelihood Statistics | 3 |
| Meta Analysis | 3 |
| Accuracy | 1 |
| Bayesian Statistics | 1 |
| Effect Size | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Factor Analysis | 1 |
| Generalization | 1 |
| Intervals | 1 |
| Monte Carlo Methods | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Research Synthesis Methods | 3 |
Author
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Korevaar, Elizabeth; Turner, Simon L.; Forbes, Andrew B.; Karahalios, Amalia; Taljaard, Monica; McKenzie, Joanne E. – Research Synthesis Methods, 2023
Interrupted time series (ITS) are often meta-analysed to inform public health and policy decisions but examination of the statistical methods for ITS analysis and meta-analysis in this context is limited. We simulated meta-analyses of ITS studies with continuous outcome data, analysed the studies using segmented linear regression with two…
Descriptors: Meta Analysis, Maximum Likelihood Statistics, Factor Analysis, Public Health
Van Lissa, Caspar J.; van Erp, Sara; Clapper, Eli-Boaz – Research Synthesis Methods, 2023
When meta-analyzing heterogeneous bodies of literature, meta-regression can be used to account for potentially relevant between-studies differences. A key challenge is that the number of candidate moderators is often high relative to the number of studies. This introduces risks of overfitting, spurious results, and model non-convergence. To…
Descriptors: Bayesian Statistics, Regression (Statistics), Maximum Likelihood Statistics, Meta Analysis
Rubio-Aparicio, María; López-López, José Antonio; Sánchez-Meca, Julio; Marín-Martínez, Fulgencio; Viechtbauer, Wolfgang; Van den Noortgate, Wim – Research Synthesis Methods, 2018
The random-effects model, applied in most meta-analyses nowadays, typically assumes normality of the distribution of the effect parameters. The purpose of this study was to examine the performance of various random-effects methods (standard method, Hartung's method, profile likelihood method, and bootstrapping) for computing an average effect size…
Descriptors: Effect Size, Meta Analysis, Intervals, Monte Carlo Methods

Peer reviewed
Direct link
