NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 6 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Babic, Andrija; Poklepovic Pericic, Tina; Pieper, Dawid; Puljak, Livia – Research Synthesis Methods, 2020
Background: It is challenging to keep systematic reviews (SR) current and updated. Cochrane designated some of its SRs as "stable," that is, not in need of updating. The issue of stabilizing an SR is an important in research synthesis, because it could help reduce research waste. The aim of this study was to analyze publicly available…
Descriptors: Literature Reviews, Research Problems, Synthesis, Evidence
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Papadimitropoulou, Katerina; Riley, Richard D.; Dekkers, Olaf M.; Stijnen, Theo; le Cessie, Saskia – Research Synthesis Methods, 2022
Meta-analysis is a widely used methodology to combine evidence from different sources examining a common research phenomenon, to obtain a quantitative summary of the studied phenomenon. In the medical field, multiple studies investigate the effectiveness of new treatments and meta-analysis is largely performed to generate the summary (average)…
Descriptors: Effect Size, Meta Analysis, Evidence, Medicine
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bender, Ralf; Friede, Tim; Koch, Armin; Kuss, Oliver; Schlattmann, Peter; Schwarzer, Guido; Skipka, Guido – Research Synthesis Methods, 2018
In systematic reviews, meta-analyses are routinely applied to summarize the results of the relevant studies for a specific research question. If one can assume that in all studies the same true effect is estimated, the application of a meta-analysis with common effect (commonly referred to as fixed-effect meta-analysis) is adequate. If…
Descriptors: Evidence, Synthesis, Meta Analysis, Research Problems
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Moustgaard, Helene; Jones, Hayley E.; Savovic, Jelena; Clayton, Gemma L.; Sterne, Jonathan AC; Higgins, Julian PT; Hróbjartsson, Asbjørn – Research Synthesis Methods, 2020
Randomized clinical trials underpin evidence-based clinical practice, but flaws in their conduct may lead to biased estimates of intervention effects and hence invalid treatment recommendations. The main approach to the empirical study of bias is to collate a number of meta-analyses and, within each, compare the results of trials with and without…
Descriptors: Epidemiology, Evidence, Medical Research, Intervention
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Freeman, S. C.; Fisher, D.; Tierney, J. F.; Carpenter, J. R. – Research Synthesis Methods, 2018
Background: Stratified medicine seeks to identify patients most likely to respond to treatment. Individual participant data (IPD) network meta-analysis (NMA) models have greater power than individual trials to identify treatment-covariate interactions (TCIs). Treatment-covariate interactions contain "within" and "across" trial…
Descriptors: Medical Research, Patients, Outcomes of Treatment, Meta Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wells, George A.; Shea, Beverley; Higgins, Julian P. T.; Sterne, Jonathan; Tugwell, Peter; Reeves, Barnaby C. – Research Synthesis Methods, 2013
Background: There is increasing interest from review authors about including non-randomized studies (NRS) in their systematic reviews of health care interventions. This series from the Ottawa Non-Randomized Studies Workshop consists of six papers identifying methodological issues when doing this. Aim: To format the guidance from the preceding…
Descriptors: Health Services, Intervention, Workshops, Research Methodology