Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Accuracy | 1 |
| Data Collection | 1 |
| Evidence | 1 |
| Language Processing | 1 |
| Models | 1 |
| Randomized Controlled Trials | 1 |
| Synthesis | 1 |
| Test Reliability | 1 |
Source
| Research Synthesis Methods | 1 |
Author
| Amanda Konet | 1 |
| Barbara Nussbaumer-Streit | 1 |
| Gerald Gartlehner | 1 |
| Graham Booth | 1 |
| Ian Thomas | 1 |
| Karen Crotty | 1 |
| Leila Kahwati | 1 |
| Meera Viswanathan | 1 |
| Nathaniel Erskine | 1 |
| Rainer Hilscher | 1 |
| Robert Chew | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Gerald Gartlehner; Leila Kahwati; Rainer Hilscher; Ian Thomas; Shannon Kugley; Karen Crotty; Meera Viswanathan; Barbara Nussbaumer-Streit; Graham Booth; Nathaniel Erskine; Amanda Konet; Robert Chew – Research Synthesis Methods, 2024
Data extraction is a crucial, yet labor-intensive and error-prone part of evidence synthesis. To date, efforts to harness machine learning for enhancing efficiency of the data extraction process have fallen short of achieving sufficient accuracy and usability. With the release of large language models (LLMs), new possibilities have emerged to…
Descriptors: Data Collection, Evidence, Synthesis, Language Processing

Peer reviewed
Direct link
