NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 12 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Davis-Lenski, Susan J. – Reading Improvement, 1994
Reports results from a study of middle school students composing from self-selected sources and presents a times-stage model of the research process. Finds that strategies used were influenced by the research stage and time left to completion; research processes were recursive rather than linear; and good readers used somewhat different strategies…
Descriptors: Educational Research, Junior High Schools, Middle School Students, Middle Schools
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McNeil, John D.; Stotsky, Kathleen – Reading Improvement, 1976
Descriptors: Higher Education, Models, Reading Instruction, Reading Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hashway, Robert M.; And Others – Reading Improvement, 1993
Uses a structural equation model to assess the impact of eight manifest variables and four latent variables upon the personal reading habits of young adults. Finds that parental socioeconomic status did influence young adults' reading habits. (SR)
Descriptors: Higher Education, Models, Reading Habits, Reading Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kippel, Gary M.; Smith, Frederick – Reading Improvement, 1975
Descriptors: Elementary Education, Evaluation Methods, Models, Program Descriptions
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Mason, Jana M. – Reading Improvement, 1975
Descriptors: Child Language, Cognitive Processes, Developmental Reading, Elementary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Anderson, Kimberley; Evans, Cay – Reading Improvement, 1996
Applies the Canonical Story Grammar Model to a major beginning reader computer series. Analyzes the teaching manual and interviews the series' representative. Finds that the stories did not contain adequate story grammar. Notes weaknesses in the manual analysis and interviews. (RS)
Descriptors: Basal Reading, Beginning Reading, Computer Assisted Instruction, Content Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Whitson, George T.; Hogan, John D. – Reading Improvement, 1983
Concludes that J. Piaget's cognitive developmental theory may be used as a framework to understand reading in all children, while visual perception showed no relationship to any measure of reading. (FL)
Descriptors: Cognitive Development, Cognitive Processes, Learning Theories, Males
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kear, Dennis J.; Carruthers, Barbara – Reading Improvement, 1983
Describes the development of an instructional model for training preschool/daycare/kindergarten staff in the area of reading readiness. Concludes that the model was effective. (FL)
Descriptors: Early Reading, Models, Preschool Education, Preschool Teachers
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Richardson, Ellis; DiBenedetto, Barbara – Reading Improvement, 1977
Concludes that beginning reading instruction organized around a phonic decoding model effectively teaches beginners how to decode novel (untaught) words, and that sound blending is important in this process. (RL)
Descriptors: Beginning Reading, Decoding (Reading), Early Childhood Education, Literature Reviews
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Anderson, Ora Sterling; Smith, Laura J. – Reading Improvement, 1987
Describes a college developmental reading laboratory model using peer tutors to provide training in comprehension study skills. Reports the results of a study evaluating the impact of training on student performance from the perspective of the participants. (MM)
Descriptors: Higher Education, Learning Laboratories, Models, Peer Teaching
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Colwell, Clyde G. – Reading Improvement, 1982
Offers a model which is intended to facilitate the processing of ideational relationships within a paragraph and which is composed of three distinct parts: (1) direct teaching, (2) functional application, and (3) increased student interaction with the text. (FL)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Connected Discourse, Content Area Reading, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kragler, Sherry – Reading Improvement, 1991
Compares the effects of the dynamic and traditional testing models on reading placement levels of Chapter I students. Finds that students have a wider range of functioning in reading than traditional placement indicates. Concludes that teachers can place students more accurately by using the dynamic model. (PRA)
Descriptors: Basal Reading, Comparative Analysis, Grade 3, High Risk Students