NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Trafimow, David; MacDonald, Justin A.; Rice, Stephen; Clason, Dennis L. – Psychological Methods, 2010
Largely due to dissatisfaction with the standard null hypothesis significance testing procedure, researchers have begun to consider alternatives. For example, Killeen (2005a) has argued that researchers should calculate p[subscript rep] that is purported to indicate the probability that, if the experiment in question were replicated, the obtained…
Descriptors: Probability, Replication (Evaluation), Statistics, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kelley, Ken; Rausch, Joseph R. – Psychological Methods, 2011
Longitudinal studies are necessary to examine individual change over time, with group status often being an important variable in explaining some individual differences in change. Although sample size planning for longitudinal studies has focused on statistical power, recent calls for effect sizes and their corresponding confidence intervals…
Descriptors: Intervals, Sample Size, Effect Size, Longitudinal Studies
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kraemer, Helena Chmura – Psychological Methods, 2005
R. Rosenthal and D. B. Rubin (2003) proposed an effect size, r-sub(equivalent), to be used when (a) only sample size and p values are known for a study, (b) there are no generally accepted effect size indicators, or (c) sample sizes are so small or the data so non-normal that the directly computed effect sizes would be more misleading than the…
Descriptors: Effect Size, Sample Size, Reader Response, Criticism