Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| English (Second Language) | 2 |
| Error Correction | 2 |
| Foreign Countries | 2 |
| Writing Assignments | 2 |
| Adolescents | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Communication Skills | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Feedback (Response) | 1 |
| Females | 1 |
| Grammar | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Online Submission | 2 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Iran | 1 |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Download full textAl-Jarf, Reima – Online Submission, 2011
Many EFL teachers spend a lot of time marking students' written assignments and correcting their spelling, grammatical, punctuation, organization and idea generation errors in detail. The more students make mistakes, the more meticulously they mark and correct mistakes. Despite meticulous error correction, students continue to make the same…
Descriptors: Error Correction, Writing Instruction, Writing Assignments, Feedback (Response)
Salmani-Nodoushan, Mohammad Ali – Online Submission, 2007
In a study conducted to see which method of error treatment was more effective in EFL writing classes, 288 Iranian EFL learners took the TOEFL test to be grouped in two homogeneous classes. Each student in each group wrote a paragraph on a general topic which was proofread for mistakes/errors by three experienced EFL writing teachers (i.e.,…
Descriptors: Writing Assignments, Remedial Instruction, English (Second Language), Error Correction
