Descriptor
Source
| New Directions for Teaching… | 5 |
Author
| Angelo, Thomas A. | 1 |
| Carpenter, C. Blaine | 1 |
| Doig, James C. | 1 |
| Fulwiler, Toby | 1 |
| Greenberg, Karen L. | 1 |
| Lunsford, Ronald F. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 5 |
| Guides - Classroom - Teacher | 2 |
| Information Analyses | 2 |
| Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 2 |
| Teachers | 2 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedAngelo, Thomas A. – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1991
Ten examples of quick and easy classroom assessment techniques, carried out by higher education faculty in 10 different disciplines, are described. The techniques, designed to inform and inspire faculty to adjust classroom instruction, focus on four dimensions of learning: declarative, procedural, conditional, and reflective. (MSE)
Descriptors: Classroom Research, Classroom Techniques, Evaluation Methods, Feedback
Peer reviewedCarpenter, C. Blaine; Doig, James C. – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1988
There are now established methods and models to assess critical thinking in any discipline. The approach selected will depend on how critical thinking is defined, whether national norms are needed, and how the results will be used. (Author)
Descriptors: College Instruction, Critical Thinking, Evaluation Methods, Higher Education
Peer reviewedGreenberg, Karen L. – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1988
Writing is central to learning and to evaluation of student progress. Holistically scored writing samples, portfolios, and evaluative grids provide effective assessments of writing proficiency and show students that writing is an essential communication skill. Writing assignments also can be used to evaluate learning in a discipline. (Author)
Descriptors: Assignments, College Instruction, Evaluation Methods, Higher Education
Peer reviewedFulwiler, Toby – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1988
The complex and comprehensive nature of writing-across-the-curriculum programs makes them difficult to evaluate. There are some measures of program effectiveness that are easy to collect and others that are worth trying for. (MSE)
Descriptors: College Curriculum, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation
Peer reviewedLunsford, Ronald F. – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1997
Offers basic guidelines for college teachers in responding to students' writing in the disciplines, with the central principle that teachers' comments should reflect their instructional goals for individual students. Suggests that fewer, more carefully designed comments are likely to be more effective than many unfocused responses. Examples of…
Descriptors: Classroom Communication, Classroom Techniques, College Instruction, Evaluation Criteria


