Descriptor
| Faculty Development | 2 |
| Intellectual Disciplines | 2 |
| Scholarship | 2 |
| Classification | 1 |
| Coding | 1 |
| College Faculty | 1 |
| Critical Thinking | 1 |
| Graduate School Faculty | 1 |
| Graduate Study | 1 |
| Interviews | 1 |
| Thinking Skills | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| New Directions for Teaching… | 2 |
Author
| Middendorf, Joan | 2 |
| Pace, David | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkMiddendorf, Joan; Pace, David – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2004
Using the Decoding the Disciplines model, faculty who are deeply ingrained in their disciplinary research answer a series of questions to understand how students think and learn in their field. The cross-disciplinary nature of the process clarifies the thinking for each discipline. (Contains 1 figure.)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Critical Thinking, Interviews, Scholarship
Middendorf, Joan; Pace, David – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2004
This chapter presents a vision in which the kinds of thinking and learning that are commonly required of students become a regular part of the teaching and scholarship within every discipline.
Descriptors: Faculty Development, Scholarship, Thinking Skills, Graduate Study
