The purpose of this chapter is to discuss the conceptual, methodological, and statistical challenges in selecting appropriate peer institutions for comparative purposes. The authors' approach embraces a Western scientific tradition that physical things and phenomena can be "reduced into a set of key variables--identifiable parts--that make key…

Since cost study data have their greatest impact when viewed within the context of institutional peers, this paper provides sources and strategies for the most effective use of comparative expenditure data. Considers comparisons at both the institutional and program level, as well as political considerations in using comparative data. Most…

Institutional comparison groups can be selected in several ways, depending on the comparison issue. The method chosen involves both technical and political considerations. (Author/MSE)

Comparative data are relatively easy to obtain, but effective use of the information requires careful planning and may produce unanticipated results. (MSE)

Data on which to base interinstitutional comparisons can be obtained directly from institutions or from a variety of secondary and tertiary sources such as national surveys, statistical publications, newsletters, directories, and organizations. Lists of these sources are included. (MSE)

The issues surrounding faculty reduction will require increasing sophistication in planning and budgeting. The institutional research professional must play a central role, including analysis of data on (1) instructional production by department, (2) faculty profiles, (3) cost variations by program and instructional level, and (4) financing of…

A case study at a major state university illustrates the opportunities and pitfalls accompanying the use of interinstitutional comparison. West Virginia University's experience suggests that the greatest impact of institutional and interstate comparisons is likely to be in long-range rather than short-term planning. (Author/MSE)