Descriptor
| College Faculty | 2 |
| Faculty Development | 2 |
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Incentives | 2 |
| Program Development | 2 |
| Administrator Role | 1 |
| College Administration | 1 |
| Deans | 1 |
| Department Heads | 1 |
| Educational Quality | 1 |
| Organizational Climate | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| New Directions for Higher… | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Administrators | 2 |
| Practitioners | 2 |
| Teachers | 2 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkBevan, John M. – New Directions for Higher Education, 1985
The potential roles of department heads, deans, and faculty development directors in guiding and monitoring the effective delivery of faculty incentives are outlined, and key factors in facilitating and inhibiting vitality and signs of increased vitality are listed. (MSE)
Descriptors: Administrator Role, College Faculty, Deans, Department Heads
Baldwin, Roger G.; Krotseng, Marsha V. – New Directions for Higher Education, 1985
For faculty members to perform at the highest levels of excellence institutions must design and implement an array of appropriate incentives and support systems effective for different faculty needs and characteristics. Collegiate and corporate illustrations are provided. (Author/MSE)
Descriptors: College Administration, College Faculty, Educational Quality, Faculty Development
