Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 7 |
Descriptor
Source
| New Directions for Community… | 25 |
Author
| Seybert, Jeffrey A. | 2 |
| Alfred, Richard L. | 1 |
| Bashford, Joanne | 1 |
| Behrendt, Richard L. | 1 |
| Bers, Trudy | 1 |
| Bragg, Ann Kieffer | 1 |
| Capoor, Madan | 1 |
| Curry, Jennifer | 1 |
| Doucette, Don | 1 |
| Duscha, Steve | 1 |
| Ewell, Peter | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 23 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 14 |
| Opinion Papers | 7 |
| Information Analyses | 2 |
| Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 8 |
| Postsecondary Education | 7 |
| Two Year Colleges | 7 |
Audience
| Practitioners | 3 |
| Researchers | 3 |
| Administrators | 1 |
Location
| California | 1 |
| Florida | 1 |
| Minnesota | 1 |
| New Jersey | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Family Educational Rights and… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Bers, Trudy – New Directions for Community Colleges, 2011
The purpose of this article is to identify key ways in which program review provides information and documentation demonstrating that a community college is effective. This is accomplished through both the program review process (the means by which reviews are conducted) and the product (program review reports and supporting evidence). The various…
Descriptors: Evidence, Program Evaluation, Institutional Evaluation, Program Effectiveness
Head, Ronald B. – New Directions for Community Colleges, 2011
The origins of institutional effectiveness are traced, its evolution within community colleges is described, the use of the term "institutional effectiveness" is analyzed, and a practical, operational definition of the term is presented. The author hopes that this definition and the discussion in this article prove useful to community college…
Descriptors: Community Colleges, Institutional Evaluation, Evaluation Criteria, College Role
Ewell, Peter; Jenkins, Davis – New Directions for Community Colleges, 2008
This chapter examines lessons learned by states that are using student unit record (SUR) data to improve outcomes for community college students and recommends steps states can take to strengthen their use of SUR databases to benefit students and communities. (Contains 1 exhibit.)
Descriptors: Community Colleges, Databases, Student Records, Data
Hom, Willard C. – New Directions for Community Colleges, 2011
Policymakers, administrators, and institutional researchers should recognize the critical stakeholders in the area of institutional effectiveness at the community college, their differences in perceptions about institutional effectiveness, and ways to negotiate these differences in perception. This article identifies the different stakeholders in…
Descriptors: Community Colleges, Institutional Evaluation, Stakeholders, Values
Ewell, Peter T. – New Directions for Community Colleges, 2011
Heightened national goals for degree attainment in the United States means increasing prominence for community colleges, which entails greater scrutiny in the form of accountability. Technology and a new generation of accountability measures appropriate to the distinctive community college mission are available to meet this challenge. This article…
Descriptors: Community Colleges, Institutional Evaluation, Accountability, Information Technology
Duscha, Steve – New Directions for Community Colleges, 1987
Explains the role of the California Employment Training Panel in ensuring that public monies are well spent by guaranteeing that training leads directly to employment. Emphasizes the importance of job training as a tool for economic development. (AYC)
Descriptors: Accountability, Community Colleges, Economic Development, Employment Programs
Capoor, Madan; Morante, Edward – New Directions for Community Colleges, 1990
Describes two state-mandated programs for institutional accountability in New Jersey (i.e., Basic Skills Assessment Program and College Outcomes Evaluation Program), which function through cooperation between the state's higher education agency and its colleges and universities. Highlights research objectives, procedures, responsibilities,…
Descriptors: Accountability, College Outcomes Assessment, Community Colleges, Cooperative Programs
Oburn, Martha – New Directions for Community Colleges, 2005
Student affairs practitioners often rely on anecdotal evidence when asked to demonstrate their contributions to the community college, but their future may depend on their ability to become more data-based and outcomes-oriented. This chapter discusses the need for a culture of evidence in student affairs, describes how to build such a culture, and…
Descriptors: Program Evaluation, Student Personnel Services, Student Personnel Workers, Community Colleges
Doucette, Don; Seybert, Jeffrey A. – New Directions for Community Colleges, 1990
Describes the Kansas Community College Research Consortium (KCCRC), focusing on motivations for organizing a research consortium to meet accountability demands, the KCCRC's organization and operating procedures, determination of objectives and dissemination of results, strengths and weaknesses, and examples of KCCRC studies. (DMM)
Descriptors: Accountability, Community Colleges, Consortia, Educational Researchers
Seybert, Jeffrey A. – New Directions for Community Colleges, 2002
Describes the assessment of student learning outcomes in six domains: general education, transfer programs, vocational and occupational education, remedial and developmental education, continuing education, and affective and noncognitive areas. Discusses the use of assessment results and the implications of assessment for external accountability…
Descriptors: Academic Standards, Accountability, College Outcomes Assessment, Community Colleges
Williams, Terry E. – New Directions for Community Colleges, 2002
Identifies key challenges for community college student services units: student diversity, a renewed focus on student success, and calls to demonstrate program effectiveness. Reviews proposed solutions to address each challenge and notes continued gaps in the literature, particularly in studies related to the need for student services staff to…
Descriptors: Accountability, College Outcomes Assessment, Community Colleges, Diversity (Student)
Bashford, Joanne – New Directions for Community Colleges, 2008
This chapter describes several examples of institutional use of state- and college-level tracking data to benchmark performance, improve student success, and enhance program effectiveness.
Descriptors: Community Colleges, Data, Data Analysis, College Students
McMillan, Virginia K.; Parke, Scott J.; Lanning, Carol A. – New Directions for Community Colleges, 1997
Examines remedial/developmental education within a rapidly changing educational environment of advanced technology and new demands. Discusses rationale for different delivery models of remedial education. (28 citations) (YKH)
Descriptors: Academic Standards, Accountability, Community Colleges, Developmental Studies Programs
Schoenecker, Craig; Reeves, Richard – New Directions for Community Colleges, 2008
This chapter describes the National Student Clearinghouse and discusses opportunities and challenges for tracking community college students. It also presents a system perspective on using clearinghouse data to promote more comprehensive student and graduate tracking. (Contains 2 tables.)
Descriptors: Transfer Rates (College), Clearinghouses, Nonprofit Organizations, Community Colleges
Behrendt, Richard L.; Parsons, Michael H. – New Directions for Community Colleges, 1983
Considers the contrasting yet complementary relationship of accountability and parity with respect to part-time faculty. Using Hagerstown Junior College as a frame of reference, considers formative and summative evaluation objectives and procedures for part-time faculty evaluation. Looks at the utility of evaluation and its benefits to faculty and…
Descriptors: Accountability, Community Colleges, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1 | 2
Peer reviewed
Direct link
