Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Behavior Problems | 6 |
| Disabilities | 6 |
| Federal Legislation | 6 |
| Special Education | 4 |
| Court Litigation | 3 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 3 |
| Principals | 3 |
| Suspension | 3 |
| Discipline | 2 |
| Educational Legislation | 2 |
| Equal Education | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| NASSP Bulletin | 6 |
Author
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 6 |
| Legal/Legislative/Regulatory… | 3 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Individuals with Disabilities… | 4 |
| Individuals with Disabilities… | 2 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Williams, Jacob; Pazey, Barbara; Fall, Anna Mária; Yates, James R.; Roberts, Garrett J. – NASSP Bulletin, 2015
The purpose of this study is to investigate factors that may influence school administrators' disciplinary decisions involving students with disabilities. Confirmatory factor analysis suggests that the investigator-developed measures adequately represent the hypothesized latent factors per the pattern of observed responses. The hypothesized…
Descriptors: Disabilities, Factor Analysis, Correlation, Administrator Attitudes
Katsiyannis, Antonis; Losinski, Mickey; Whitford, Denise K.; Counts, Jennifer – NASSP Bulletin, 2017
The use of aversives as a method for behavioral intervention in U.S. public schools has been a persistent concern and often subject to litigation, particularly among students with disabilities. The use of aversives (restraint, seclusion, and corporal punishment) have been supported in some cases due to their perceived necessity to keep children…
Descriptors: Negative Reinforcement, Special Education, Disabilities, Principals
Peer reviewedKing, Ashley Thomas – NASSP Bulletin, 1996
A survey of exclusionary discipline practices with handicapped students revealed a national pattern of "de facto" differential treatment. In denying a school's unilateral authority to remove dangerous or disruptive students, the Supreme Court's judgment in "Honig v. Doe" (1988) took precedence over all earlier court decisions.…
Descriptors: Behavior Problems, Court Litigation, Disabilities, Due Process
Peer reviewedZirkel, Perry A. – NASSP Bulletin, 1999
Recounts the case of Lauren, a moderately disabled student suspended for disruptive, aggressive behavior before the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act was amended. The Seventh Court of Appeals upheld the suspension. The majority of such cases have gone against districts, reflecting a relatively high judicial standard of dangerous…
Descriptors: Behavior Problems, Compliance (Legal), Court Litigation, Disabilities
Peer reviewedOsborne, Allan G., Jr. – NASSP Bulletin, 1998
Under provisions of the 1997 Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments, school officials may change a disruptive student's placement before the situation escalates and requires disciplinary measures. IDEA's purpose is to address students' disabilities, including those causing them to misbehave. Also, disabled students may be suspended…
Descriptors: Behavior Problems, Disabilities, Discipline, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewedMorrissey, Patricia – NASSP Bulletin, 1998
In passing the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997, Congress tackled tough issues regarding educating students with disabilities. This article addresses four changes to IDEA and their implications for secondary principals, including suspension of handicapped students without educational services, development of…
Descriptors: Behavior Problems, Disabilities, Discipline, Expulsion

Direct link
