Descriptor
Source
| NASSP Bulletin | 5 |
Author
| Bickel, Lauri R. | 1 |
| Carrick, Charles F. | 1 |
| Fields, Joseph C. | 1 |
| Herman, Jerry J. | 1 |
| Lepard, David H. | 1 |
| Rentsch, George J. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 4 |
| Opinion Papers | 2 |
| Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Administrators | 2 |
| Practitioners | 2 |
Location
| Wisconsin | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedBickel, Lauri R. – NASSP Bulletin, 1995
When the four administrators at a Wisconsin high school indicated they would appreciate staff feedback about their performance, union representatives undertook the task of formalizing an evaluation agreement, developing an evaluation instrument, implementing the evaluation process, and reviewing assessment procedures. The instrument and written…
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, High Schools, Program Development
Peer reviewedRentsch, George J. – NASSP Bulletin, 1976
Administrators, who assess others, cannot themselves be immune from assessment. A plan for administrator assessment is offered. (Editor/RK)
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Charts, Educational Objectives, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewedHerman, Jerry J. – NASSP Bulletin, 1993
An effective administrator evaluation system builds in feedback opportunities, two-way communication, opportunities for improvement, enforcement of strengths, and a clear understanding of the system. The system must be valid, reliable, meaningful, useful, and feasible. Procedural answers to the why-what-when-where-what-who questions are discussed…
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Due Process, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewedLepard, David H. – NASSP Bulletin, 1986
Developing, launching, and maintaining an assessment center plan requires continuous attention to three essential ingredients: communication, education, and politics. The four key considerations in developing a master plan are costs, scheduling, sources of funding, and terms of the agreement required by NASSP. A sample agreement is provided. (TE)
Descriptors: Administrator Education, Administrator Evaluation, Assessment Centers (Personnel), Consultants
Peer reviewedFields, Joseph C.; Carrick, Charles F. – NASSP Bulletin, 1986
Thirteen ideas for marketing and implementing the assessment center concept are presented. These call for a primary focus on individuals and on excellence, preparation and organization, assessor training, assessor newsletters, accessible locations, a statewide advisory board, an action plan, confidentiality, both causal and formal meetings,…
Descriptors: Administrator Education, Administrator Evaluation, Administrator Selection, Assessment Centers (Personnel)


