Descriptor
| Evaluation Methods | 2 |
| Matrices | 2 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Computation | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Criteria | 1 |
| Data Analysis | 1 |
| Models | 1 |
| Multitrait Multimethod… | 1 |
| Multivariate Analysis | 1 |
| Sample Size | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Multivariate Behavioral… | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedReichardt, Charles S.; Coleman, S. C. – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1995
The criteria for assessing convergent and discriminant validity proposed by D. T. Campbell and D. W. Fiske (1959) are shown to be inadequate for either the additive or multiplicative structures of data in a multitrait-multimethod matrix. Model-specific criteria are more promising for assessing convergent and discriminant validity. (Author/SLD)
Descriptors: Correlation, Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Matrices
Vallejo, Guillermo; Livacic-Rojas, Pablo – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2005
This article compares two methods for analyzing small sets of repeated measures data under normal and non-normal heteroscedastic conditions: a mixed model approach with the Kenward-Roger correction and a multivariate extension of the modified Brown-Forsythe (BF) test. These procedures differ in their assumptions about the covariance structure of…
Descriptors: Computation, Multivariate Analysis, Sample Size, Matrices

Direct link
