NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 14 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wall, Melanie M.; Guo, Jia; Amemiya, Yasuo – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2012
Mixture factor analysis is examined as a means of flexibly estimating nonnormally distributed continuous latent factors in the presence of both continuous and dichotomous observed variables. A simulation study compares mixture factor analysis with normal maximum likelihood (ML) latent factor modeling. Different results emerge for continuous versus…
Descriptors: Sample Size, Simulation, Form Classes (Languages), Diseases
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Woods, Carol M. – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2009
Differential item functioning (DIF) occurs when an item on a test or questionnaire has different measurement properties for 1 group of people versus another, irrespective of mean differences on the construct. This study focuses on the use of multiple-indicator multiple-cause (MIMIC) structural equation models for DIF testing, parameterized as item…
Descriptors: Test Bias, Structural Equation Models, Item Response Theory, Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Maydeu-Olivares, Alberto; Hernandez, Adolfo – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2007
The interpretation of a Thurstonian model for paired comparisons where the utilities' covariance matrix is unrestricted proved to be difficult due to the comparative nature of the data. We show that under a suitable constraint the utilities' correlation matrix can be estimated, yielding a readily interpretable solution. This set of identification…
Descriptors: Identification, Structural Equation Models, Matrices, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
MacCallum, Robert C.; And Others – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1994
Alternative strategies for two-sample cross-validation of covariance structure models are described and investigated. Results of an empirical sampling study show that for tighter strategies simpler models are preferred in smaller samples, but when cross-validation is employed, a more complex model is supported even for small samples. (SLD)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Evaluation Methods, Models, Research Methodology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Chen, Fang Fang; West, Stephen G.; Sousa, Karen H. – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2006
Bifactor and second-order factor models are two alternative approaches for representing general constructs comprised of several highly related domains. Bifactor and second-order models were compared using a quality of life data set (N = 403). The bifactor model identified three, rather than the hypothesized four, domain specific factors beyond the…
Descriptors: Quality of Life, Models, Sample Size, Factor Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lee, Sik-Yum; Song, Xin-Yuan – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2004
The main objective of this article is to investigate the empirical performances of the Bayesian approach in analyzing structural equation models with small sample sizes. The traditional maximum likelihood (ML) is also included for comparison. In the context of a confirmatory factor analysis model and a structural equation model, simulation studies…
Descriptors: Sample Size, Factor Analysis, Structural Equation Models, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Timm, Neil H. – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1999
Investigates the equality of "p" correlated effect sizes for "k" independent studies in which treatment and control groups are compared using Hotelling's "T" statistic. Illustrates the procedure and discusses the importance of sample size. (SLD)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Control Groups, Correlation, Effect Size
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Wilcox, Rand R. – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1995
Five methods for testing the hypothesis of independence between two sets of variates were compared through simulation. Results indicate that two new methods, based on robust measures reflecting the linear association between two random variables, provide reasonably accurate control over Type I errors. Drawbacks to rank-based methods are discussed.…
Descriptors: Analysis of Covariance, Comparative Analysis, Hypothesis Testing, Robustness (Statistics)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Vallejo, Guillermo; Livacic-Rojas, Pablo – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2005
This article compares two methods for analyzing small sets of repeated measures data under normal and non-normal heteroscedastic conditions: a mixed model approach with the Kenward-Roger correction and a multivariate extension of the modified Brown-Forsythe (BF) test. These procedures differ in their assumptions about the covariance structure of…
Descriptors: Computation, Multivariate Analysis, Sample Size, Matrices
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Fava, Joseph L.; Velicer, Wayne F. – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1992
Principal component, image component, three types of factor score estimates, and one scale score method were compared over different levels of variables, saturations, sample sizes, variable to component ratios, and pattern rotations. There were virtually no overall differences among methods, with the average correlation between matched scores…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Correlation, Equations (Mathematics), Estimation (Mathematics)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Anderson, Lance E.; And Others – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1996
Simulations were used to compare the moderator variable detection capabilities of moderated multiple regression (MMR) and errors-in-variables regression (EIVR). Findings show that EIVR estimates are superior for large samples, but that MMR is better when reliabilities or sample sizes are low. (SLD)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Error of Measurement, Estimation (Mathematics), Interaction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Shieh, Gwowen – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2003
Repeated measures and longitudinal studies arise often in social and behavioral science research. During the planning stage of such studies, the calculations of sample size are of particular interest to the investigators and should be an integral part of the research projects. In this article, we consider the power and sample size calculations for…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Behavioral Science Research, Monte Carlo Methods, Longitudinal Studies
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lix, Lisa M.; Algina, James; Keselman, H. J. – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2003
The approximate degrees of freedom Welch-James (WJ) and Brown-Forsythe (BF) procedures for testing within-subjects effects in multivariate groups by trials repeated measures designs were investigated under departures from covariance homogeneity and normality. Empirical Type I error and power rates were obtained for least-squares estimators and…
Descriptors: Interaction, Freedom, Sample Size, Multivariate Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Tang, K. Linda; Algina, James – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1993
Type I error rates of four multivariate tests (Pilai-Bartlett trace, Johansen's test, James' first-order test, and James' second-order test) were compared for heterogeneous covariance matrices in 360 simulated experiments. The superior performance of Johansen's test and James' second-order test is discussed. (SLD)
Descriptors: Analysis of Covariance, Analysis of Variance, Comparative Analysis, Equations (Mathematics)