Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Source
| Metacognition and Learning | 2 |
Author
| Bannert, Maria | 1 |
| Fan, Yizhou | 1 |
| Gaševic, Dragan | 1 |
| Harskamp, Egbert G. | 1 |
| Jacobse, Annemieke E. | 1 |
| Kilgour, Jonathan | 1 |
| Lim, Lyn | 1 |
| Molenaar, Inge | 1 |
| Moore, Johanna | 1 |
| Rakovic, Mladen | 1 |
| Singh, Shaveen | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Grade 5 | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Fan, Yizhou; van der Graaf, Joep; Lim, Lyn; Rakovic, Mladen; Singh, Shaveen; Kilgour, Jonathan; Moore, Johanna; Molenaar, Inge; Bannert, Maria; Gaševic, Dragan – Metacognition and Learning, 2022
Contemporary research that looks at self-regulated learning (SRL) as processes of learning events derived from trace data has attracted increasing interest over the past decade. However, limited research has been conducted that looks into the validity of trace-based measurement protocols. In order to fill this gap in the literature, we propose a…
Descriptors: Validity, Metacognition, Learning Strategies, Artificial Intelligence
Jacobse, Annemieke E.; Harskamp, Egbert G. – Metacognition and Learning, 2012
Metacognitive monitoring and regulation play an essential role in mathematical problem solving. Therefore, it is important for researchers and practitioners to assess students' metacognition. One proven valid, but time consuming, method to assess metacognition is by using think-aloud protocols. Although valuable, practical drawbacks of this method…
Descriptors: Protocol Analysis, Predictive Validity, Problem Solving, Metacognition

Peer reviewed
Direct link
