Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Elementary School Students | 2 |
| Measures (Individuals) | 2 |
| Metacognition | 2 |
| Protocol Analysis | 2 |
| Questionnaires | 2 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Grade 3 | 1 |
| Grade 5 | 1 |
| Intelligence | 1 |
| Mathematics | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Metacognition and Learning | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 2 |
| Grade 3 | 1 |
| Grade 5 | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkJacobse, Annemieke E.; Harskamp, Egbert G. – Metacognition and Learning, 2012
Metacognitive monitoring and regulation play an essential role in mathematical problem solving. Therefore, it is important for researchers and practitioners to assess students' metacognition. One proven valid, but time consuming, method to assess metacognition is by using think-aloud protocols. Although valuable, practical drawbacks of this method…
Descriptors: Protocol Analysis, Predictive Validity, Problem Solving, Metacognition
Desoete, Annemie – Metacognition and Learning, 2008
Third grade elementary school children solved tests on mathematical reasoning and numerical facility. Metacognitive skillfulness was assessed through think aloud protocols, prospective and retrospective child ratings, teacher questionnaires, calibration measures and EPA2000. In our dataset metacognition has a lot in common with intelligence, but…
Descriptors: Elementary School Students, Intelligence, Protocol Analysis, Validity
