NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Maxwell, Nicholas P.; Huff, Mark J. – Metacognition and Learning, 2022
Research has shown that judgments of learning (JOLs) often produce a reactive effect on the learning of cue-target pairs in which target recall differs between participants who provide item-based JOLs at study versus those who do not. Positive reactivity, or the memory improvement found when JOLs are provided, is typically observed on related…
Descriptors: Metacognition, Memory, Associative Learning, Cues
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Froese, Linda; Roelle, Julian – Metacognition and Learning, 2022
Generating own examples for previously encountered new concepts is a common and highly effective learning activity, at least when the examples are of high quality. Unfortunately, however, students are not able to accurately evaluate the quality of their own examples and instructional support measures such as idea unit standards that have been…
Descriptors: College Students, Cognitive Processes, Concept Formation, Cognitive Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yang, Chunliang; Yu, Rongjun; Hu, Xiao; Luo, Liang; Huang, Tina S.-T.; Shanks, David R. – Metacognition and Learning, 2021
Judgments of learning (JOLs) play a fundamental role in helping learners regulate their study strategies but are susceptible to various kinds of illusions and biases. These can potentially impair learning efficiency, and hence understanding the mechanisms underlying the formation of JOLs is important. Many studies have suggested that both…
Descriptors: Learning, Evaluative Thinking, Beliefs, Cognitive Processes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Zhao, Qin; Linderholm, Tracy – Metacognition and Learning, 2011
Two experiments were conducted to investigate anchoring effects on metacomprehension judgments as a function of fictitious information participants received about past peer performance. In Experiment 1 participants were randomly assigned to one of the three anchor groups that, in some cases, provided past peer performance averages in terms of a…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Investigations, Experiments, Peer Evaluation