NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 10 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Zhao, Wenbo; Yin, Yue; Hu, Xiao; Shanks, David R.; Yang, Chunliang; Luo, Liang – Metacognition and Learning, 2023
Item memory (e.g., recall or recognition of specific items) can reactively change when metacognitively monitored via judgments of learning (JOLs). The current research explores whether memory for inter-item relations (e.g., semantic relations among list items) is reactively influenced by JOLs. Participants in Experiment 1 studied rhyming word…
Descriptors: Memory, Metacognition, Recall (Psychology), Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Nicholas P. Maxwell; Mark J. Huff – Metacognition and Learning, 2024
Judgments of learning (JOLs) are often reactive on memory for cue-target pairs. This pattern, however, is moderated by relatedness, as related but not unrelated pairs often show a memorial benefit compared to a no-JOL control group. Based on Soderstrom et al.'s, "Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition" 41,…
Descriptors: Decision Making, Recall (Psychology), Cues, Cognitive Processes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Maxwell, Nicholas P.; Huff, Mark J. – Metacognition and Learning, 2022
Research has shown that judgments of learning (JOLs) often produce a reactive effect on the learning of cue-target pairs in which target recall differs between participants who provide item-based JOLs at study versus those who do not. Positive reactivity, or the memory improvement found when JOLs are provided, is typically observed on related…
Descriptors: Metacognition, Memory, Associative Learning, Cues
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Chang, Minyu; Brainerd, C. J. – Metacognition and Learning, 2023
Making judgments of learning (JOLs) can sometimes modify subsequent memory performance, which is referred to as JOL reactivity. We evaluated two major theoretical explanations of JOL reactivity and used the dual-retrieval model to pinpoint the retrieval processes that are modified by JOLs. The changed-goal hypothesis assumes that JOLs highlight…
Descriptors: Cues, Evaluative Thinking, Models, Recall (Psychology)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sophie Wacker; Claudia M. Roebers – Metacognition and Learning, 2024
When young children evaluate their confidence, their monitoring is often overoptimistic, that is, inaccurate. The present study investigated a potential underlying mechanism for kindergarteners' and second graders' overconfidence within a paired associates learning paradigm. We implemented a pre-monitoring phase motivating children to…
Descriptors: Metacognition, Decision Making, Comparative Analysis, Student Motivation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Maxwell, Nicholas P.; Perry, Trevor; Huff, Mark J. – Metacognition and Learning, 2022
Judgments of learning (JOL) are often used to assess memory monitoring at encoding. Participants study a cue-target word pair (e.g., mouse-cheese) and are asked to rate the probability of correctly recalling the target in the presence of the cue at test (e.g., mouse -?). Prior research has shown that JOL accuracy is sensitive to perceptual cues.…
Descriptors: Metacognition, Layout (Publications), Decision Making, Memory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Roebers, Claudia M.; Kälin, Sonja; Aeschlimann, Eva A. – Metacognition and Learning, 2020
In the past decade, research increasingly uncovers emerging metacognitive skills in young children by using child-friendly, creative, and non-verbal measures of metacognition. In the present study, the now often used non-verbal "opt-out" paradigm and classical verbal metacognitive judgments (judgments-of-learning and confidence…
Descriptors: Verbal Communication, Nonverbal Communication, Metacognition, Young Children
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hughes, Gregory I.; Taylor, Holly A.; Thomas, Ayanna K. – Metacognition and Learning, 2018
The ways in which adult learners study information influences their judgment-of-learning (JOL) accuracy (e.g., Koriat et al. "Journal of Experimental Psychology: General," determine whether developing learners' metacognitive monitoring is similarly influenced by different study techniques. In two experiments, we examined JOL accuracy in…
Descriptors: Accuracy, Metacognition, College Students, Adolescents
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Destan, Nesrin; Spiess, Manuela A.; de Bruin, Anique; van Loon, Mariëtte; Roebers, Claudia M. – Metacognition and Learning, 2017
The current study investigated kindergarteners and second graders' ability to monitor and evaluate their own and a virtual peer's performance in a paired-associate learning task. Participants provided confidence judgments (CJs) for their own responses and performance-based judgments (judgments provided "after" receiving feedback on their…
Descriptors: Kindergarten, Associative Learning, Feedback (Response), Metacognition
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Son, Lisa K.; Kornell, Nate – Metacognition and Learning, 2009
Learners of all ages face complex decisions about how to study effectively. Here we investigated three such decisions made in concert--time allocation, ordering, and spacing. First, college students were presented with, and made judgments of learning about, 16 word-synonym pairs. Then, when presented with all 16 pairs, they created their own study…
Descriptors: Time Management, Decision Making, Study Habits, College Students