Descriptor
| Automation | 4 |
| Systems Development | 4 |
| Archives | 3 |
| Information Technology | 2 |
| Models | 2 |
| Academic Libraries | 1 |
| Bibliographic Utilities | 1 |
| Classification | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Computer Software | 1 |
| Computer System Design | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Library Trends | 4 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 4 |
| Opinion Papers | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedGilliland, Anne J. – Library Trends, 1988
Provides a historical perspective on archival automation and an overview of the management, planning, staffing, and user considerations that arise as a consequence of automation. Future technological developments are summarized. (41 references) (MES)
Descriptors: Archives, Automation, Information Technology, Institutional Administration
Peer reviewedHonhart, Frederick L. – Library Trends, 1988
Considers the effects of the new MARC AMC (Archival and Manuscripts Control) format when applied to a microcomputer-based local system for archival operations. Development of the MicroMARC:amc system at Michigan State University is described, and the implications of technological changes on such systems are discussed. (MES)
Descriptors: Academic Libraries, Archives, Automation, Bibliographic Utilities
Peer reviewedDrr, W. Theodore – Library Trends, 1988
An approach to the design of flexible text-based management systems for archives includes tiers for repository, software, and user management systems. Each tier has four layers--objective, program, result, and interface. Traps awaiting software development companies involve the market, competition, operations, and finance. (10 references) (MES)
Descriptors: Archives, Automation, Computer Software, Computer System Design
Peer reviewedAllen, Nancy S. – Library Trends, 1988
Describes the development and outcome of a cooperative computerization effort involving nine public and university museums. The discussion covers the project goals, data development and analysis, and contributions resulting form the project. Appendices provide the system data fields used and a comparison between automation of library and museum…
Descriptors: Automation, Classification, Comparative Analysis, Consortia


