Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 4 |
Descriptor
| Animals | 4 |
| Short Term Memory | 4 |
| Evaluation Methods | 2 |
| Intervals | 2 |
| Task Analysis | 2 |
| Association (Psychology) | 1 |
| Attention | 1 |
| Coding | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Conditioning | 1 |
| Cues | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Learning and Motivation | 4 |
Author
| April, L. Brooke | 1 |
| Babb, Stephanie J. | 1 |
| Bruce, Katherine | 1 |
| Cohen, Jerome | 1 |
| Crystal, Jonathon D. | 1 |
| Galizio, Mark | 1 |
| Han, Xue | 1 |
| Hlynka, Myron | 1 |
| Machado, Armando | 1 |
| Matei, Anca | 1 |
| Parameswaran, Varakini | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 4 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
April, L. Brooke; Bruce, Katherine; Galizio, Mark – Learning and Motivation, 2013
The olfactory span task (OST) uses an incrementing non-matching to sample procedure such that the number of stimuli to remember increases during the session. The number of consecutive correct responses (span length) and percent correct as a function of the memory load have been viewed as defining rodent working memory capacity limitations in…
Descriptors: Task Analysis, Responses, Familiarity, Performance
Pinto, Carlos; Machado, Armando – Learning and Motivation, 2011
To better understand short-term memory for temporal intervals, we re-examined the choose-short effect. In Experiment 1, to contrast the predictions of two models of this effect, the subjective shortening and the coding models, pigeons were exposed to a delayed matching-to-sample task with three sample durations (2, 6 and 18 s) and retention…
Descriptors: Intervals, Infants, Tests, Short Term Memory
Cohen, Jerome; Han, Xue; Matei, Anca; Parameswaran, Varakini; Zuniga, Robert; Hlynka, Myron – Learning and Motivation, 2010
When rats had to find new (jackpot) objects for rewards from among previously sampled baited objects, increasing the number of objects in the sample (study) segment of a trial from 3 to 5 and then to 7 (Experiment 1) or from 3 to 6 and 9 (Experiments 2 and 3) or from 6 to 9 and 12 (Experiment 4) did not reduce rats' test segment performance.…
Descriptors: Laboratory Experiments, Short Term Memory, Rewards, Probability
Crystal, Jonathon D.; Babb, Stephanie J. – Learning and Motivation, 2008
We investigated the time course of spatial-memory decay in rats using an eight-arm radial maze. It is well established that performance remains high with retention intervals as long as 4 h, but declines to chance with a 24-h retention interval (Beatty, W. W., & Shavalia, D. A. (1980b). Spatial memory in rats: time course of working memory and…
Descriptors: Animals, Intervals, Short Term Memory, Memorization

Peer reviewed
Direct link
