Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 3 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 6 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 6 |
Descriptor
Source
| Learning Disability Quarterly | 10 |
Author
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 10 |
| Reports - Research | 7 |
| Guides - Classroom - Teacher | 1 |
| Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
Education Level
| Early Childhood Education | 5 |
| Elementary Education | 5 |
| Primary Education | 5 |
| Grade 1 | 3 |
| Grade 2 | 2 |
| Kindergarten | 2 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| Grade 3 | 1 |
Audience
| Researchers | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Dynamic Indicators of Basic… | 2 |
| Peabody Picture Vocabulary… | 1 |
| Wechsler Intelligence Scale… | 1 |
| Woodcock Johnson Tests of… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Burns, Matthew K.; VanDerHeyden, Amanda M.; Duesenberg-Marshall, McKinzie D.; Romero, Monica E.; Stevens, Mallory A.; Izumi, Jared T.; McCollom, Elizabeth M. – Learning Disability Quarterly, 2023
Students with dyslexia demonstrate reading difficulty in early literacy skills (e.g., phonemic awareness, word recognition, decoding), and administering screeners is a necessary step to implement effective intervention. There are several commonly used reading screeners, but the decision accuracy and predictive value between them varies. In the…
Descriptors: Dyslexia, Screening Tests, At Risk Students, Reading Difficulties
Smith, R. Alex; Lembke, Erica S. – Learning Disability Quarterly, 2022
This study represents an initial examination of the potential of word dictation (WD), a form of curriculum-based measure, to identify risk in writing for young English language learners (ELs). The sample included 73 ELs with beginning to advanced English language proficiency in the first to third grades attending schools in one U.S. Midwestern…
Descriptors: English Language Learners, Language Proficiency, Language Tests, Curriculum Based Assessment
Brian Gearin; Yaacov Petscher; Christopher Stanley; Nancy J. Nelson; Hank Fien – Learning Disability Quarterly, 2022
Previous studies of K-12 dyslexia legislation have described broad trends in legislative content, such as the presence or absence of screening and intervention requirements. This study uses document analysis to provide a finer-grained description of the laws to highlight critical variation in policy that will directly affect (a) the number and…
Descriptors: Dyslexia, Elementary Secondary Education, Educational Legislation, At Risk Students
de León, Sara C.; Jiménez, Juan E.; García, Eduardo; Gutiérrez, Nuria; Gil, Verónica – Learning Disability Quarterly, 2021
The main purpose of this study was to validate the curriculum-based measure "Indicadores de Progreso de Aprendizaje en Matemáticas" (IPAM [Indicators of Basic Early Math Skills]) in a local, Spanish-speaking context. This tool has been designed to identify first-grade students at risk for mathematics learning disabilities. The IPAM…
Descriptors: Mathematics Skills, Curriculum Based Assessment, Grade 1, Elementary School Students
Cummings, Kelli D.; Smolkowski, Keith; Baker, Doris Luft – Learning Disability Quarterly, 2021
Universal screening is a critical component of school-based prevention systems. Screening data enable educators to target students for supplemental intervention, align resources to meet needs, and identify students who may be at risk for learning disabilities. One major requirement of the screening process is that all students are included to gain…
Descriptors: Emergent Literacy, Reading Difficulties, Learning Disabilities, Screening Tests
Fletcher, Jack M.; Francis, David J.; Foorman, Barbara R.; Schatschneider, Christopher – Learning Disability Quarterly, 2021
Many states now mandate early screening for dyslexia, but vary in how they address these mandates. There is confusion about the nature of screening versus diagnostic assessments, risk versus diagnosis, concurrent versus predictive validity, and inattention to indices of classification accuracy as the basis for determining risk. To help define what…
Descriptors: Dyslexia, Disability Identification, Screening Tests, Item Response Theory
Peer reviewedMercer, Cecil D.; And Others – Learning Disability Quarterly, 1988
The research concerning three major types of measures designed to identify young children at risk of experiencing school problems is reviewed. Teacher perception, test batteries, and single instruments are discussed in terms of general considerations for use, advantages, and disadvantages. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Developmental Disabilities, Early Identification, Evaluation Methods, Handicap Identification
Peer reviewedWilson, Barry J.; Reichmuth, Sr. Monica – Learning Disability Quarterly, 1985
Several criteria are proposed for determining and communicating screening results. These criteria provide a context for judging prediction accuracy. It is argued that accuracy of prediction is of little value and cannot be considered sufficient unless the predictions lead to better educational opportunities for the students about whom they are…
Descriptors: Disabilities, Disability Identification, Early Childhood Education, High Risk Persons
Peer reviewedMercer, Cecil D.; And Others – Learning Disability Quarterly, 1979
Teacher perception, test batteries, and single instruments are presented as the major types of procedures for predicting which preschool children are at risk for experiencing school problems. (SBH)
Descriptors: Early Childhood Education, Evaluation Methods, Identification, Learning Disabilities
Peer reviewedInglis, James; Lawson, J. S. – Learning Disability Quarterly, 1987
Reanalysis of data derived from a meta-analysis of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised, using a learning disability index derived from a principal-components analysis, found that the test discriminated reliably between 9,372 learning-disabled children and their non-disabled peers. (Author/CB)
Descriptors: Children, Diagnostic Tests, Elementary Education, Handicap Identification

Direct link
