Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Source
| Learning Disability Quarterly | 3 |
Author
| Reed, Deborah K. | 2 |
| Weiser, Beverly L. | 2 |
| Allen, Elizabeth A. | 1 |
| Cummings, Kelli D. | 1 |
| Hott, Brittany L. | 1 |
| Kethley, Caroline I. | 1 |
| Mathes, Patricia G. | 1 |
| Richter, Lori | 1 |
| Scruggs, Thomas E. | 1 |
| Smolkowski, Keith | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Reed, Deborah K.; Cummings, Kelli D.; Allen, Elizabeth A.; Weiser, Beverly L.; Hott, Brittany L.; Smolkowski, Keith – Learning Disability Quarterly, 2014
The Council for Learning Disabilities' Research Committee hosted a "Must Read" session at the 35th Annual International Conference in which they discussed influential articles published between August 1, 2012, and July 31, 2013. Articles were selected in six areas relevant to learning disabilities research and practice: response to…
Descriptors: Synthesis, Learning Disabilities, Conferences (Gatherings), International Studies
Weiser, Beverly L.; Reed, Deborah K.; Kethley, Caroline I.; Mathes, Patricia G. – Learning Disability Quarterly, 2012
In October 2011, Council for Learning Disabilities' (CLD's) research committee members (i.e., authors of this article) presented their "Must Reads" at the organization's 33rd Annual International Conference on Learning Disabilities. In this article, the presenters summarize a few of their selected articles and state why each article is a "Must…
Descriptors: Learning Disabilities, Reading Instruction, Research Committees, Organizations (Groups)
Peer reviewedScruggs, Thomas E.; Richter, Lori – Learning Disability Quarterly, 1986
Twenty-four empirical investigations of tutoring interventions were evaluated. Although all authors favored their use, equivocal results were reported. Particularly weak were substantiated reports of social benefits to tutors or tutees. Methodological problems associated with such research in field settings are discussed, and implications for…
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Learning Disabilities, Research Methodology, Synthesis

Direct link
