Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Computer Assisted Testing | 2 |
| Language Tests | 2 |
| Oral Language | 2 |
| Scoring | 2 |
| Second Language Learning | 2 |
| Accuracy | 1 |
| Audio Equipment | 1 |
| Classification | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| English (Second Language) | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Language Testing | 2 |
Author
| Xi, Xiaoming | 2 |
| Higgins, Derrick | 1 |
| Ling, Guangming | 1 |
| Mollaun, Pamela | 1 |
| Williamson, David | 1 |
| Zechner, Klaus | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Test of English as a Foreign… | 2 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Ling, Guangming; Mollaun, Pamela; Xi, Xiaoming – Language Testing, 2014
The scoring of constructed responses may introduce construct-irrelevant factors to a test score and affect its validity and fairness. Fatigue is one of the factors that could negatively affect human performance in general, yet little is known about its effects on a human rater's scoring quality on constructed responses. In this study, we compared…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Fatigue (Biology), Scoring, Performance
Xi, Xiaoming; Higgins, Derrick; Zechner, Klaus; Williamson, David – Language Testing, 2012
This paper compares two alternative scoring methods--multiple regression and classification trees--for an automated speech scoring system used in a practice environment. The two methods were evaluated on two criteria: construct representation and empirical performance in predicting human scores. The empirical performance of the two scoring models…
Descriptors: Scoring, Classification, Weighted Scores, Comparative Analysis

Peer reviewed
Direct link
