Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 3 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
| Computer Assisted Testing | 3 |
| Language Tests | 3 |
| Oral Language | 3 |
| Scores | 3 |
| Second Language Learning | 3 |
| Comparative Analysis | 2 |
| Language Proficiency | 2 |
| Attention | 1 |
| Chinese | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Cues | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Language Testing | 3 |
Author
| Winke, Paula | 3 |
| Gass, Susan M. | 1 |
| Isbell, Dan | 1 |
| Isbell, Daniel R. | 1 |
| Lee, Shinhye | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| ACTFL Oral Proficiency… | 2 |
| Test of English as a Foreign… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Isbell, Dan; Winke, Paula – Language Testing, 2019
The American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages (ACTFL) oral proficiency interview -- computer (OPIc) testing system represents an ambitious effort in language assessment: Assessing oral proficiency in over a dozen languages, on the same scale, from virtually anywhere at any time. Especially for users in contexts where multiple foreign…
Descriptors: Oral Language, Language Tests, Language Proficiency, Second Language Learning
Isbell, Daniel R.; Winke, Paula; Gass, Susan M. – Language Testing, 2019
Language tests are useful for many purposes, including monitoring language learning progress and evaluating language programs. This study investigated the interpretations and usefulness of the American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages (ACTFL) Oral Proficiency Interview -- Computer (OPIc) scores across four languages at a large US…
Descriptors: Oral Language, Language Proficiency, Second Language Learning, Language Tests
Lee, Shinhye; Winke, Paula – Language Testing, 2018
We investigated how young language learners process their responses on and perceive a computer-mediated, timed speaking test. Twenty 8-, 9-, and 10-year-old non-native English-speaking children (NNSs) and eight same-aged, native English-speaking children (NSs) completed seven computerized sample TOEFL® Primary™ speaking test tasks. We investigated…
Descriptors: Elementary School Students, Second Language Learning, Responses, Computer Assisted Testing

Peer reviewed
Direct link
