Descriptor
Source
| Journal of Teaching Writing | 7 |
Author
| Gebhardt, Richard C. | 1 |
| Kleine, Michael | 1 |
| Krest, Margie | 1 |
| Lovejoy, Kim B. | 1 |
| Meyer, Charles F. | 1 |
| Simpson, Jeanne H | 1 |
| Sommers, Jeffrey | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 7 |
| Guides - Classroom - Teacher | 5 |
| Opinion Papers | 4 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 3 |
| Teachers | 3 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedKrest, Margie – Journal of Teaching Writing, 1988
Distinguishes between monitoring and evaluating student writing, discusses the rationale for monitoring, demonstrates monitoring procedures, and summarizes major considerations to remember when monitoring writing. (JAD)
Descriptors: Freshman Composition, Higher Education, Revision (Written Composition), Student Writing Models
Peer reviewedLovejoy, Kim B. – Journal of Teaching Writing, 1987
Applies H. P. Grice's theory of conversation (the Cooperative Principle, and the Maxims of Quality, Quantity, Relation and Manner) to a method of teaching revision. Explains that viewing writing as a cooperative transaction improves students' sense of audience, purpose, and diction. Analyzes a student draft via this method. (JG)
Descriptors: Freshman Composition, Higher Education, Pragmatics, Revision (Written Composition)
Peer reviewedMeyer, Charles F. – Journal of Teaching Writing, 1986
Arguing that writing teachers can neither ignore the teaching of grammar nor expect it to succeed if taught in the traditional way, examines the methods, organization, exercises and terminology of the freshman English handbook, identifies problems, and suggests alternatives to helping students satisfactorily edit their papers. (JG)
Descriptors: Freshman Composition, Grammar, Higher Education, Revision (Written Composition)
Peer reviewedSimpson, Jeanne H – Journal of Teaching Writing, 1985
Evaluates the efficacy of heuristics in the composition classroom, the importance of theory in teaching invention, the application of heuristics to stages of writing besides prewriting, and various heuristic systems. Describes the development of a theory of invention and pedagogy based on classroom experiment and the writings of other theorists.…
Descriptors: College English, Expository Writing, Freshman Composition, Heuristics
Peer reviewedGebhardt, Richard C. – Journal of Teaching Writing, 1986
Discusses revision as a growth-through-change process occurring continuously through all stages of drafting. Describes several ways in which word processing facilitates invention, substitution, reordering, adding, cutting and other aspects of this kind of composing. Offers guidelines for using computers in the writing classroom. (JG)
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Instruction, Computer Uses in Education, Freshman Composition, Higher Education
Peer reviewedSommers, Jeffrey – Journal of Teaching Writing, 1989
Identifies student misunderstanding of teacher criticism and a lack of context for that criticism as problems in composition classes. Describes how an instructor provided taped comments on student papers to make criticisms clearer to students. Details how the procedure was used in guiding one student's successive drafts. (SG)
Descriptors: Audiotape Recordings, Case Studies, Criticism, Freshman Composition
Peer reviewedKleine, Michael – Journal of Teaching Writing, 1985
Analyzes small-group writing conversation among freshman composition students, identifying the following roles: (1) evaluator, (2) immediate reader, (3) role playing audience, and (4) helpful listener. Presents transcripts of student conversations illustrating these roles, and suggests ways to improve what is said. (JG)
Descriptors: Class Activities, Expository Writing, Freshman Composition, Group Dynamics


