Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
| Language Processing | 3 |
| Comprehension | 2 |
| Experiments | 2 |
| Reading | 2 |
| Sentences | 2 |
| Brain | 1 |
| Decision Making | 1 |
| Dictionaries | 1 |
| Educational Research | 1 |
| Electronic Learning | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Memory and Language | 3 |
Author
| McRae, Ken | 3 |
| Elman, Jeffrey L. | 2 |
| Hare, Mary | 2 |
| Kutas, Marta | 2 |
| Bicknell, Klinton | 1 |
| Grondin, Ray | 1 |
| Lupker, Stephen J. | 1 |
| Metusalem, Ross | 1 |
| Urbach, Thomas P. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Metusalem, Ross; Kutas, Marta; Urbach, Thomas P.; Hare, Mary; McRae, Ken; Elman, Jeffrey L. – Journal of Memory and Language, 2012
Recent research has demonstrated that knowledge of real-world events plays an important role in guiding online language comprehension. The present study addresses the scope of event knowledge activation during the course of comprehension, specifically investigating whether activation is limited to those knowledge elements that align with the local…
Descriptors: Comprehension, Sentences, Linguistics, Language Processing
Bicknell, Klinton; Elman, Jeffrey L.; Hare, Mary; McRae, Ken; Kutas, Marta – Journal of Memory and Language, 2010
This research tests whether comprehenders use their knowledge of typical events in real time to process verbal arguments. In self-paced reading and event-related brain potential (ERP) experiments, we used materials in which the likelihood of a specific patient noun ("brakes" or "spelling") depended on the combination of an agent and verb…
Descriptors: Form Classes (Languages), Language Processing, Reading, Sentences
Grondin, Ray; Lupker, Stephen J.; McRae, Ken – Journal of Memory and Language, 2009
When asked to list semantic features for concrete concepts, participants list many features for some concepts and few for others. Concepts with many semantic features are processed faster in lexical and semantic decision tasks [Pexman, P. M., Lupker, S. J., & Hino, Y. (2002). "The impact of feedback semantics in visual word recognition:…
Descriptors: Semantics, Word Recognition, Semiotics, Language Processing

Peer reviewed
Direct link
