Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Source
| Journal of Learning… | 37 |
Author
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 29 |
| Reports - Research | 23 |
| Information Analyses | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - General | 1 |
Audience
| Researchers | 5 |
| Practitioners | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Cavalli, Eddy; Colé, Pascale; Leloup, Gilles; Poracchia-George, Florence; Sprenger-Charolles, Liliane; El Ahmadi, Abdessadek – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2018
Developmental dyslexia is a lifelong impairment affecting 5% to 10% of the population. In French-speaking countries, although a number of standardized tests for dyslexia in children are available, tools suitable to screen for dyslexia in adults are lacking. In this study, we administered the "Alouette" reading test to a normative sample…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Screening Tests, Disability Identification, Dyslexia
Sideridis, Georgios; Padeliadu, Susana – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2013
The purpose of the present studies was to provide the means to create brief versions of instruments that can aid the diagnosis and classification of students with learning disabilities and comorbid disorders (e.g., attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder). A sample of 1,108 students with and without a diagnosis of learning disabilities took part…
Descriptors: Test Construction, Learning Disabilities, Disability Identification, Classification
Peer reviewedRafoth, Mary Ann K. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1988
The validity of using an analysis of patterns of performance on the Meeting Street School Screening test versus using the composite cutoff score for identification of learning disabilities was analyzed for 1,377 first graders. Use of subtest scatter predicted later learning disability placements less accurately than chance. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Early Identification, Grade 1, Handicap Identification, Learning Disabilities
Peer reviewedLindsay, G. A.; Wedell, K. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1982
The basic assumptions underlying the development of early identification procedures for at-risk children are reviewed. The effectiveness of screening measures designed to identify educationally "at-risk" children is critically examined. It is concluded that there is a general lack of evidence for the usefulness of such instruments. (Author)
Descriptors: Disability Identification, Early Childhood Education, Screening Tests, Test Validity
Peer reviewedMeade, Linda S.; And Others – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1981
To examine the concurrent and construct validity of the Slingerland Screening Tests (SST) for Children with Specific Language Disability in the assessment of learning disabilities, 382 children in grades 1 through 4 were given both the SST and an IQ test. The SST errors were significantly negatively correlated with IQ scores. (Author)
Descriptors: Disability Identification, Elementary Education, Intelligence Tests, Learning Disabilities
Peer reviewedBryan, Tanis Schwartz; McGrady, Harold J. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1972
A study of the Pupil Behavior Rating Scale was made to determine its factor structure and to determine its utility for screening children at the elementary school level to identify potential learning disabilities. (Author)
Descriptors: Behavior Rating Scales, Exceptional Child Research, Identification, Learning Disabilities
Peer reviewedKane, Joan; Gill, Richard P. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1972
Descriptors: Exceptional Child Research, Identification, Learning Disabilities, Perceptual Motor Coordination
Peer reviewedWatkins, Marley W.; Kush, Joseph C.; Schaefer, Barbara A. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2002
This study compared students diagnosed with learning disabilities (n=2,053) and students without learning disabilities (n=2,200) on the Learning Disability Index (LDI). Subsamples of specific reading and math disabilities permitted further assessment. Analysis indicated the LDI resulted in a correct diagnostic decision only 55 to 64 percent of the…
Descriptors: Decision Making, Diagnostic Tests, Disability Identification, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewedChin, Christopher E.; Ledesma, Heloise Marie L.; Cirino, Paul T.; Sevcik, Rose A.; Morris, Robin D.; Frijters, Jan C.; Lovett, Maureen W. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2001
Concurrent validity of the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test (K-BIT) with the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition (WISC-III) was evaluated. Both measures were administered to 65 children (ages 6-7). Results suggest caution against using the K-BIT exclusively for placement and diagnostic purposes with young children with reading…
Descriptors: Concurrent Validity, Disability Identification, Intelligence Tests, Primary Education
Peer reviewedMcKnab, Paul A.; Fine, Marvin J. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1972
The usefulness of the Vane Kindergarten Test in the early identification of children with learning problems was tested. (Author/GW)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Diagnostic Tests, Exceptional Child Research, Identification
Peer reviewedLewis, Ann – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1980
The English Picture Vocabulary Test and the Croydon Checklist (for teachers) were used for screening along with a standardized reading test to measure the predictive validity of the screening instruments. Results indicated that a number of children were misclassified and reasons for this, such as teachers' misconceptions, are discussed. (PHR)
Descriptors: Elementary Education, Exceptional Child Research, Foreign Countries, Identification
Peer reviewedVan Camp, Sarah S. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1980
To better identify the auditory strengths of elementary school children, a test was developed using a pure tone approach with sets of signals. (SBH)
Descriptors: Auditory Perception, Diagnostic Tests, Disability Identification, Elementary Education
Peer reviewedColligan, Robert C. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1979
The validity of the Myklebust Pupil Rating Scale (PRS) in predicting learning disability was investigated in a two-year follow-up study of 55 preschool children. Correlational analysis yielded highly significant results with all correlations between the PRS scores and criterion measures. (SBH)
Descriptors: Early Childhood Education, Exceptional Child Research, Followup Studies, Identification
Peer reviewedBaum, Dale D.; Kelly, Thomas J. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1979
Study involving 300 children investigated the validity of Slosson Intelligence Test (SIT) for identifying learning disabled kindergarteners. Ss were given a battery of tests, including Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence. Results indicated that SIT greatly overestimates the IQ of kindergarten children with suspected learning…
Descriptors: Early Childhood Education, Exceptional Child Research, Identification, Intelligence Tests
Peer reviewedColligan, Robert C. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1977
To determine the value of the Pupil Rating Scale (PRS) in identifying children at risk for learning difficulty, a sample of 60 kindergarten children was studied intensively to determine whether the PRS would correlate as well with achievement measures as reported in H. Myklebust's normative sample. (Author/SBH)
Descriptors: Behavior Rating Scales, Early Childhood Education, Exceptional Child Research, Identification

Direct link
