NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 7 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Morlini, Isabella; Stella, Giacomo; Scorza, Maristella – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2015
Tools for assessing decoding skill in students attending elementary grades are of fundamental importance for guaranteeing an early identification of reading disabled students and reducing both the primary negative effects (on learning) and the secondary negative effects (on the development of the personality) of this disability. This article…
Descriptors: Decoding (Reading), Elementary School Students, Reading Rate, Accuracy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lovett, Benjamin J.; Sparks, Richard L. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2013
Much has been written about gifted students with learning disabilities, but there have been few large-scale empirical investigations, and the concept has proven controversial. The authors reviewed the available empirical literature on these students, focusing on (a) the criteria by which the students were identified and (b) the students'…
Descriptors: Gifted Disabled, Learning Disabilities, Disability Identification, Standardized Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Limbos, Marjolaine M.; Geva, Esther – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2001
This study examined the accuracy of teacher (N=51) assessments in screening for reading disabilities among Grade 1 students of English as a second language (N=249) and as a first language (N=120). Results indicated that teacher rating scales and nominations had low sensitivity in identifying reading disability in either group as determined by a…
Descriptors: Disability Identification, English (Second Language), Primary Education, Reading Difficulties
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Badian, Nathlie A. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1984
WPPS (Weschsler Preschool Primary Scale of Intelligence) and screening test scores of 72 children at risk for learning disability at age five were examined three years later. At follow-up there were 32 poor and 40 good readers. Both groups had average intelligence at age five and had received similar special help. (Author/CL)
Descriptors: Disability Identification, High Risk Persons, Intelligence Tests, Learning Disabilities
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Sikora, Darryn M.; Plapinger, Donald S. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1994
The use of standardized psychoeducational diagnostic instruments to identify learning disabilities was evaluated with 19 students (ages 7 to 13) with sensorineural hearing impairments. Students with hearing impairment were found to demonstrate learning disabilities with a frequency similar to that found in students with normal hearing, suggesting…
Descriptors: Clinical Diagnosis, Diagnostic Tests, Disability Identification, Elementary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Sofie, Cecilia A.; Riccio, Cynthia A. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2002
Standardized, norm-referenced measures of achievement, phonological processing measures, and curriculum-based measures of reading fluency were used with 40 children (Grades 1-2), including 20 children with reading disabilities. All measures were found to correlate significantly with each other; however, correlations were generally in the moderate…
Descriptors: Curriculum Based Assessment, Disability Identification, Educational Diagnosis, Elementary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
MacMillan, Donald L.; Gresham, Frank M.; Bocian, Kathleen M. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1998
This study evaluated 150 elementary students previously referred to school study teams for possible learning disability (LD) as defined by a discrepancy between IQ and performance on a standardized achievement test. Comparison with actual school-based decisions found fewer than half of students certified as LD by local schools evidenced the…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Compliance (Legal), Definitions, Disability Identification