NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)2
Since 2006 (last 20 years)4
Source
Journal of Learning…23
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 23 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Tolar, Tammy D.; Fuchs, Lynn; Fletcher, Jack M.; Fuchs, Douglas; Hamlett, Carol L. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2016
Three cohorts of third-grade students (N = 813) were evaluated on achievement, cognitive abilities, and behavioral attention according to contrasting research traditions in defining math learning disability (LD) status: low achievement versus extremely low achievement and IQ-achievement discrepant versus strictly low-achieving LD. We use methods…
Descriptors: Grade 3, Elementary School Students, Mathematics Instruction, Learning Disabilities
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lambert, Katharina; Spinath, Birgit – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2018
The aim of the present study was to investigate the associations between elementary school children's mathematical achievement and their conservation abilities, visuospatial skills, and numerosity processing speed. We also assessed differences in these abilities between children with different types of learning problems. In Study 1 (N = 229), we…
Descriptors: Correlation, Elementary School Students, Elementary School Mathematics, Visual Perception
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Andersen, Per N.; Egeland, Jens; Øie, Merete – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2013
There are relatively few studies on learning and delayed memory with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The objective of the present study was to examine acquisition, free delayed memory, and recognition skills in medication naive children and adolescents aged 8-16 years with ADHD combined subtype (36 participants) and inattentive…
Descriptors: Learning Problems, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, Memory, Neurological Impairments
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kanaya, Tomoe; Ceci, Stephen – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2012
Because of the Flynn effect, IQ scores rise as a test norm ages but drop on the introduction of a newly revised test norm. The purpose of the current study was to determine the impact of the Flynn effect on learning disability (LD) diagnoses, the most prevalent special education diagnosis in the United States. Using a longitudinal sample of 875…
Descriptors: Intelligence, Learning Disabilities, Intelligence Tests, Intelligence Quotient
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Litt, Jonathan; Taylor, H. Gerry; Klein, Nancy; Hack, Maureen – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2005
This study examined achievement, neuropsychological, and intervention outcomes at a mean age of 11 years in children with very low birthweight (VLBW, < 1,500 g) compared with a term-born control group. To assess the prevalence and correlates of specific learning disabilities (LD), the sample was limited to children without neurosensory disorders…
Descriptors: Learning Problems, Incidence, Intelligence Quotient, Control Groups
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McConaughty, Stephanie H.; Ritter, David R. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1985
Parents' reports on social competence and behavioral problems were obtained for 123 learning disabled boys aged 6-11. On average, the parents of LD boys reported significantly lower levels of social competence and more behavior problems than normative samples. (Author/CL)
Descriptors: Behavior Problems, Elementary Education, Intelligence Quotient, Interpersonal Competence
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Meyen, Edward – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1989
This response argues that Linda Siegel's paper (EC221505) confuses measures of intelligence with predicted achievement, calls for doing away with the construct of learning disabilities rather than the discrepancy definition model, and overlooks the need to determine which students qualify for special educational services for treatment of learning…
Descriptors: Educational Diagnosis, Elementary Secondary Education, Handicap Identification, Intelligence Quotient
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Baldwin, R. Scott; Vaughn, Sharon – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1989
This critique of a paper by Linda Siegel (EC221505) challenges Siegel's assumptions on the relationship of Intelligence Quotient to learning disabilities as being unacceptable and non-literature-based, and points out that discussion of Intelligence Quotient cutoffs may be moot given that 49 states employ no cutoff for learning disabilities. (JDD)
Descriptors: Definitions, Educational Diagnosis, Elementary Secondary Education, Handicap Identification
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Stanovich, Keith E. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1989
This commentary supports Linda Siegel's challenge to the learning disabilities field (in EC221505) to produce data indicating that dyslexic readers differ from other poor readers in their cognitive processing, educational prognosis, and response to treatment. The commentary also points out that the existence of Matthew effects reinforces Siegel's…
Descriptors: Educational Diagnosis, Elementary Secondary Education, Handicap Identification, Intelligence Quotient
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lyon, Mark A. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1995
This study examined differences between Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition (WISC-III) and Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised (WISC-R) scores for 40 elementary students with learning disabilities. WISC-III Full Scale, Verbal, and Performance scores were lower than comparable WISC-R scores by one-third to one-half a…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Correlation, Disability Identification, Elementary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Siegel, Linda S. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1989
Use of the discrepancy approach in defining learning disabilities is challenged, as intelligence tests do not measure potential, are not independent from what is measured by achievement tests, and are not powerful predictors of low reading performance. Use of intelligence tests in analysis, identification, and definition of learning disabilities…
Descriptors: Definitions, Educational Diagnosis, Elementary Secondary Education, Handicap Identification
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Torgesen, Joseph K. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1989
In commenting on Linda Siegel's argument (in EC221505) that Intelligence Quotient is not causally related to reading difficulties, this paper argues that Intelligence Quotient is relevant to the definition of reading disabilities but that present knowledge may not justify its use in the selection of children for special services. (JDD)
Descriptors: Definitions, Educational Diagnosis, Elementary Secondary Education, Handicap Identification
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Swanson, H. Lee – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1989
This response to Linda Siegel's paper (EC221505) suggests some alternative explanations of phonological processing as a basis for determining reading disability. Discussed are the use of pseudoword tests, the relationship between phonological coding and intelligence quotient, and the relationship between phonological coding and reading…
Descriptors: Educational Diagnosis, Elementary Secondary Education, Handicap Identification, Intelligence Quotient
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lyon, G. Reid – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1989
This response to a paper by Linda Siegel (EC221505) on the relationship between Intelligence Quotient and learning disabilities addresses the differences between classification and identification, limitations in Siegel's conceptualization of intelligence, and the representation of the language and learning domains subsumed within the learning…
Descriptors: Classification, Educational Diagnosis, Elementary Secondary Education, Handicap Identification
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Stanton, Warren R.; And Others – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1990
Analyses of data obtained from 779 New Zealand children showed that family adversity and preschool-age intelligence quotient predicted problem behavior during the first year at school, but reading scores accounted for a larger proportion of the variance in later behavior problem scores than did school-age intelligence quotients. (Author/JDD)
Descriptors: Behavior Problems, Elementary Secondary Education, Family Influence, Family Status
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2