NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)0
Since 2006 (last 20 years)8
Source
Journal of Learning…21
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 21 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Cahan, Sorel; Fono, Dafna; Nirel, Ronit – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2012
The regression-based discrepancy definition of learning disabilities has been suggested by Rutter and Yule as an improvement of the well-known and much criticized achievement-intelligence discrepancy definition, whereby the examinee's predicted reading attainment is substituted for the intelligence score in the discrepancy expression. Even though…
Descriptors: Intelligence, Learning Disabilities, Predictive Validity, Definitions
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lovett, Benjamin J.; Sparks, Richard L. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2013
Much has been written about gifted students with learning disabilities, but there have been few large-scale empirical investigations, and the concept has proven controversial. The authors reviewed the available empirical literature on these students, focusing on (a) the criteria by which the students were identified and (b) the students'…
Descriptors: Gifted Disabled, Learning Disabilities, Disability Identification, Standardized Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wilson, Shauna B.; Lonigan, Christopher J. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2010
Emergent literacy skills are predictive of children's early reading success, and literacy achievement in early schooling declines more rapidly for children who are below-average readers. It is therefore important for teachers to identify accurately children at risk for later reading difficulty so children can be exposed to effective emergent…
Descriptors: Reading Difficulties, Early Reading, Preschool Children, Emergent Literacy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Phillips, Beth M.; Lonigan, Christopher J.; Wyatt, Marcy A. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2009
This study examined concurrent and longitudinal relations for the "Get Ready to Read!" (GRTR) emergent literacy screener. This measure, within a battery of oral language, letter knowledge, decoding, and phonological awareness tests, was administered to 204 preschool children (mean age = 53.6, SD = 5.78; 55% male) from diverse…
Descriptors: Reading Difficulties, Oral Language, Phonological Awareness, Predictive Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Souroulla, Andry Vrachimi; Panayiotou, Georgia; Kokkinos, Constantinos M. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2009
The purpose of the study was to examine whether the Greek translation of the "Learning Disability Evaluation Scale" (LDES) can be used in the identification of learning disabilities. The LDES was completed by 165 teachers for one of their students, aged 5 to 14 years. The LDES was significantly correlated to students' grades in Math and…
Descriptors: Learning Disabilities, Factor Analysis, Measures (Individuals), Disability Identification
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Scheltinga, Femke; van der Leij, Aryan; Struiksma, Chris – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2010
The objective of this study was to investigate the contribution of rapid digit naming, phonological memory, letter sound naming, and orthographic knowledge to the prediction of responsiveness to a school-based, individual intervention of word reading fluency problems of 122 Dutch second and third graders whose reading scores were below the 10th…
Descriptors: Reading Difficulties, Intervention, Reading Fluency, Psychometrics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Catts, Hugh W.; Petscher, Yaacov; Schatschneider, Christopher; Bridges, Mindy Sittner; Mendoza, Katherin – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2009
Response to intervention (RTI) holds great promise for the early identification and prevention of reading disabilities. The success of RTI rests in part on the accuracy of universal screening tools used within this framework. Despite advancements, screening instruments designed to identify children at risk for reading disabilities continue to have…
Descriptors: Reading Difficulties, Reading Achievement, Predictive Validity, Disabilities
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rafoth, Mary Ann K. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1988
The validity of using an analysis of patterns of performance on the Meeting Street School Screening test versus using the composite cutoff score for identification of learning disabilities was analyzed for 1,377 first graders. Use of subtest scatter predicted later learning disability placements less accurately than chance. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Early Identification, Grade 1, Handicap Identification, Learning Disabilities
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kass, Corrine E.; And Others – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1982
Discrimination analyses indicated that the subtests chosen for hypothesized age-related deficits classified from 77 percent to 89 percent of the cases as compared with the school district's selection. (Author)
Descriptors: Developmental Stages, Disability Identification, Learning Disabilities, Student Placement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gajar, Anna H. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1987
Modern Language Aptitude Test scores of regular students (N=244) enrolled in introductory foreign language classes were compared with their foreign language course performance. The fourth and fifth subtests predicted ability to learn a foreign language. Learning disabled (N=51) university students scored poorly on all five subtests. (DB)
Descriptors: Aptitude Tests, Handicap Identification, Higher Education, Learning Disabilities
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Martin, Roy P.; Foels, Patricia; Clanton, Greg; Moon, Kathryn – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2004
A sizable literature has demonstrated that the achievement of children in early elementary school is related to their season of birth: Those born in summer typically perform less well than those born in the fall. A small literature indicates that more children diagnosed with specific learning disabilities (SLD) are born in the summer. We have…
Descriptors: Identification, Learning Disabilities, Birth, Grade Repetition
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Molfese, Victoria J.; Modglin, Arlene A.; Beswick, Jennifer L.; Neamon, Jessica D.; Berg, Shelby A.; Berg, C. Jeffrey; Molnar, Andrew – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2006
Development of reading skills was examined in 4-year-old children from low-income homes attending a prekindergarten program. Fall to spring gains in letter identification were examined and compared with skills in phonological processing, rhyme detection, and environmental print, and with performance on a screening tool ("Get Ready to Read"). It…
Descriptors: Skill Development, Rhyme, Identification, Reading Skills
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rivers, Diane; Smith, Tom E. C. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1988
Assessment batteries of 200 elementary children with learning disabilities were analyzed to identify practices associated with the use of individual intelligence and achievement tests. Among conclusions: Many students identified as SLD have below-average intelligence, do not exhibit discrepancies on the Wechsler scale, and do not have severe…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Definitions, Elementary Education, Eligibility
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Speece, Deborah L. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2005
Attention to growth may net more accurate screening results than have been apparent in the long history of early identification research. Instead of relying solely on measures administered at one time point, including a measure of children's growth or responsiveness may add an important dimension to the screening equation and provide a clearer…
Descriptors: Reading Difficulties, Early Intervention, Disability Identification, Screening Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Cornoldi, Cesare; Venneri, Annalena; Marconato, Fabio; Molin, Adriana; Montinari, Cinzia – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2003
An 18-item "Shortened Visuospatial Questionnaire" (SVS) was validated twice, first by verifying that children (ages 8-13) identified with the SVS questionnaire as having visuospatial learning disability (VSLD) (n=54) actually showed visuospatial deficits on psychometric evaluation, and second, by rating with the SVS a clinically identified…
Descriptors: Disability Identification, Elementary Education, Learning Disabilities, Questionnaires
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2